<p><sup>1</sup> Figures may not sum to N due to missing values.</p><p><sup>^</sup> N represents observations. CI = Confidence Interval</p><p>p-value by non-parametric test of trend:</p><p><sup>+</sup> = p-value <0.01;</p><p><sup>#</sup> = 0.01 < p-value <0.05;</p><p><sup>$</sup> At least two of the three criteria: Clue cells detected, whiff test positive, vaginal pH greater than 4.5.</p><p>Distribution of factors by bacterial community state type.</p
A set of 50 vaginal samples, each from a different woman, was selected based on the self-reported an...
<p>Bacterial taxonomic profiling revealed differences between stable and severe decliner communities...
<p>A, the relative abundances of different phyla; B, the relative abundances of different classes in...
<p>Not all cells sum to N due to missing data.</p><p>Comparisons by group by Chi-square test, or by ...
Welch’s non-parametric t-test shows that those groups are significantly different in their B:F popul...
<p>The distribution is presented based on mean relative abundance values (x-axis) of these OTU-s amo...
A. Average O/E ratio of Actinomyces in evenly distributed mock community samples stratified by V reg...
<p>Relatively abundant bacteria with significantly different distributions between the normal and ca...
Even mock samples n = 21 (atcc_even n = 18 samples; bei_even n = 3 samples). n/a = Bacteria listed w...
<p>The cumulative relative abundances of anaerobic genera (<i>Actinomyces</i>, <i>Fusobacterium</i>,...
<p>The figure displays a barplot with standard error of the taxonomic distribution of the twenty mos...
<p>Heat map of proportions of bacterial taxa identified from 184 specimens from 52 participants. Val...
<p>Bonferroni-corrected <i>p</i>-values for significance (at 0.05 criterion) of bacterial taxa were ...
<p>Statistically significant differences in genera are indicated with an asterisk (*) (p<0.05). The ...
#<p>Relative abundance given by mean ± SE.</p><p>***<i>P</i> = <0.001 (t-test).</p><p>Identification...
A set of 50 vaginal samples, each from a different woman, was selected based on the self-reported an...
<p>Bacterial taxonomic profiling revealed differences between stable and severe decliner communities...
<p>A, the relative abundances of different phyla; B, the relative abundances of different classes in...
<p>Not all cells sum to N due to missing data.</p><p>Comparisons by group by Chi-square test, or by ...
Welch’s non-parametric t-test shows that those groups are significantly different in their B:F popul...
<p>The distribution is presented based on mean relative abundance values (x-axis) of these OTU-s amo...
A. Average O/E ratio of Actinomyces in evenly distributed mock community samples stratified by V reg...
<p>Relatively abundant bacteria with significantly different distributions between the normal and ca...
Even mock samples n = 21 (atcc_even n = 18 samples; bei_even n = 3 samples). n/a = Bacteria listed w...
<p>The cumulative relative abundances of anaerobic genera (<i>Actinomyces</i>, <i>Fusobacterium</i>,...
<p>The figure displays a barplot with standard error of the taxonomic distribution of the twenty mos...
<p>Heat map of proportions of bacterial taxa identified from 184 specimens from 52 participants. Val...
<p>Bonferroni-corrected <i>p</i>-values for significance (at 0.05 criterion) of bacterial taxa were ...
<p>Statistically significant differences in genera are indicated with an asterisk (*) (p<0.05). The ...
#<p>Relative abundance given by mean ± SE.</p><p>***<i>P</i> = <0.001 (t-test).</p><p>Identification...
A set of 50 vaginal samples, each from a different woman, was selected based on the self-reported an...
<p>Bacterial taxonomic profiling revealed differences between stable and severe decliner communities...
<p>A, the relative abundances of different phyla; B, the relative abundances of different classes in...