<p>The figure displays a barplot with standard error of the taxonomic distribution of the twenty most abundant bacterial genera, with names highlighted in bold indicating genera that showed a significant difference between the two environments (p-value < 0.05).</p
<p>Statistically significant differences in genera are indicated with an asterisk (*) (p<0.05). The ...
The analysis was performed at the Class and Order levels. Only taxa with a Benjamin-Hochberg correct...
<p>The x-axis shows the sample studied, the y-axis the proportion of each lineage as reported by com...
<p>The figure displays a heatmap of the 40 faecal bacterial communities found, with names highlighte...
‘Other’ group represents all taxa with relative abundance below 0.75%. Each bar plot represents the ...
<p>Differentially abundant genera having a median abundance > 0.1% in at least one group of samples ...
1<p>Values for each sampling period represent mean values (n = 3) ± standard error.</p
<p>The colored segments of each bar represent the proportion of reads mapping to different bacterial...
Taxonomic distributions are depicted for the ranks of Phylum a), Class b), Order c) and Genera d). E...
<p>Box plot showing the relative abundance of the bacterial genera shared by all samples, represente...
The relative genera taxonomic level abundance of bacterial communities detected in each case. The hi...
<p>The size of dots is corresponding to the abundance of each bacterial genus. Names of the genera w...
Only the bacterial genera share more than 2% relative abundance, which is indicated by different col...
<p>Bacterial genera with significantly different abundance between the three groups.</p
<p>All bacterial genera present at or above 0.1% of the total are listed. Data are from MiSeq Report...
<p>Statistically significant differences in genera are indicated with an asterisk (*) (p<0.05). The ...
The analysis was performed at the Class and Order levels. Only taxa with a Benjamin-Hochberg correct...
<p>The x-axis shows the sample studied, the y-axis the proportion of each lineage as reported by com...
<p>The figure displays a heatmap of the 40 faecal bacterial communities found, with names highlighte...
‘Other’ group represents all taxa with relative abundance below 0.75%. Each bar plot represents the ...
<p>Differentially abundant genera having a median abundance > 0.1% in at least one group of samples ...
1<p>Values for each sampling period represent mean values (n = 3) ± standard error.</p
<p>The colored segments of each bar represent the proportion of reads mapping to different bacterial...
Taxonomic distributions are depicted for the ranks of Phylum a), Class b), Order c) and Genera d). E...
<p>Box plot showing the relative abundance of the bacterial genera shared by all samples, represente...
The relative genera taxonomic level abundance of bacterial communities detected in each case. The hi...
<p>The size of dots is corresponding to the abundance of each bacterial genus. Names of the genera w...
Only the bacterial genera share more than 2% relative abundance, which is indicated by different col...
<p>Bacterial genera with significantly different abundance between the three groups.</p
<p>All bacterial genera present at or above 0.1% of the total are listed. Data are from MiSeq Report...
<p>Statistically significant differences in genera are indicated with an asterisk (*) (p<0.05). The ...
The analysis was performed at the Class and Order levels. Only taxa with a Benjamin-Hochberg correct...
<p>The x-axis shows the sample studied, the y-axis the proportion of each lineage as reported by com...