<p>Statistically significant differences in genera are indicated with an asterisk (*) (p<0.05). The Other category contains all other genera present at <0.01% of assignable reads at genus level. No significant differences in any of these genera between the 3 groups was found using non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis analysis, where statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05, adjusted for ties.</p
<p>The members of the phyla Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Actinobac...
<p>Bacterial abundance for known mock samples and 6 other variable regions of forward reads. (A) Gen...
<p>Superscript letters across rows denote significant difference at P<0.05 determined using Mann Whi...
<p>The figure displays a barplot with standard error of the taxonomic distribution of the twenty mos...
<p>Other contains phyla present at < 1% of assignable sequences at phylum level.</p
‘Other’ group represents all taxa with relative abundance below 0.75%. Each bar plot represents the ...
<p>Differentially abundant genera having a median abundance > 0.1% in at least one group of samples ...
<p>The statistical significance is indicated for a comparison of the secretors/<i>FUT2</i> genotypes...
<p>Bacterial genera with significantly different abundance between the three groups.</p
<p>The x-axis shows the sample studied, the y-axis the proportion of each lineage as reported by com...
<p>Presence (%) and differences in the relative abundance of bacterial families/genera and fungal or...
<p>n = 20 for each genotype. Significance tested using Mann Whitney U with Bonferroni correction.</p...
1<p>Values for each sampling period represent mean values (n = 3) ± standard error.</p
<p>Sequences in 3% OTUs were classified and grouped at the genus level. Taxa representing <0.3% of t...
The analysis was performed at the Class and Order levels. Only taxa with a Benjamin-Hochberg correct...
<p>The members of the phyla Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Actinobac...
<p>Bacterial abundance for known mock samples and 6 other variable regions of forward reads. (A) Gen...
<p>Superscript letters across rows denote significant difference at P<0.05 determined using Mann Whi...
<p>The figure displays a barplot with standard error of the taxonomic distribution of the twenty mos...
<p>Other contains phyla present at < 1% of assignable sequences at phylum level.</p
‘Other’ group represents all taxa with relative abundance below 0.75%. Each bar plot represents the ...
<p>Differentially abundant genera having a median abundance > 0.1% in at least one group of samples ...
<p>The statistical significance is indicated for a comparison of the secretors/<i>FUT2</i> genotypes...
<p>Bacterial genera with significantly different abundance between the three groups.</p
<p>The x-axis shows the sample studied, the y-axis the proportion of each lineage as reported by com...
<p>Presence (%) and differences in the relative abundance of bacterial families/genera and fungal or...
<p>n = 20 for each genotype. Significance tested using Mann Whitney U with Bonferroni correction.</p...
1<p>Values for each sampling period represent mean values (n = 3) ± standard error.</p
<p>Sequences in 3% OTUs were classified and grouped at the genus level. Taxa representing <0.3% of t...
The analysis was performed at the Class and Order levels. Only taxa with a Benjamin-Hochberg correct...
<p>The members of the phyla Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Actinobac...
<p>Bacterial abundance for known mock samples and 6 other variable regions of forward reads. (A) Gen...
<p>Superscript letters across rows denote significant difference at P<0.05 determined using Mann Whi...