<p>(a) restoration results using method [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0120885#pone.0120885.ref011" target="_blank">11</a>], and (b) restoration results using method [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0120885#pone.0120885.ref013" target="_blank">13</a>].</p
<p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0090742#s3" target="_blank"...
(a) Marked image. (b) Tampered image. (c) Tampered regions. (d) Second-stage detection of Hu et al.’...
<p>Comparison of methods and results of current study with three previously published meta-analysis ...
<p>This includes all the data from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal....
<p>Few notable results from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.01...
a<p>See section 9 of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0039308#s...
(a) Marked image. (b) Tampered image. (c) Tampered regions. (d) Second-stage detection of Hu et al.’...
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average PSNR value for the test images.</p
<p>SNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.</p
Comparison of relevant results: (a) damaged images, (b) Darabi’s results [20], (c) Barnes’ results [...
<p>Different methods applied to the example of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1...
<p>A comparison of the heuristic approach used versus the standard heuristic approach[<a href="http:...
<p>The matching result of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0190...
Results comparing Assessment #1 and Assessment #3 representing combined effects of both treatments.<...
<p>Efficiency comparison of proposed method with the method in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/artic...
<p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0090742#s3" target="_blank"...
(a) Marked image. (b) Tampered image. (c) Tampered regions. (d) Second-stage detection of Hu et al.’...
<p>Comparison of methods and results of current study with three previously published meta-analysis ...
<p>This includes all the data from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal....
<p>Few notable results from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.01...
a<p>See section 9 of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0039308#s...
(a) Marked image. (b) Tampered image. (c) Tampered regions. (d) Second-stage detection of Hu et al.’...
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average PSNR value for the test images.</p
<p>SNR comparison of the three reconstruction methods for the half-dose dataset in Figure 10.</p
Comparison of relevant results: (a) damaged images, (b) Darabi’s results [20], (c) Barnes’ results [...
<p>Different methods applied to the example of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1...
<p>A comparison of the heuristic approach used versus the standard heuristic approach[<a href="http:...
<p>The matching result of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0190...
Results comparing Assessment #1 and Assessment #3 representing combined effects of both treatments.<...
<p>Efficiency comparison of proposed method with the method in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/artic...
<p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0090742#s3" target="_blank"...
(a) Marked image. (b) Tampered image. (c) Tampered regions. (d) Second-stage detection of Hu et al.’...
<p>Comparison of methods and results of current study with three previously published meta-analysis ...