Results comparing Assessment #1 and Assessment #3 representing combined effects of both treatments.</p
Comparison of the qualitative and quantitative results of all vaccine brands (N = 453).</p
<p>Comparison of efficacy between combined therapy and chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs alone.</p
<p>Comparison of the clinical effects between patients with complete VICC and partial VICC.</p
<p>A comparison of the effects among Analysis I, II, III and IV on each outcome in terms of the stat...
Outcome data at each posttreatment assessment point and results from pairwise comparisons between tr...
<p>Comparison of the scores before and after the intervention in the three groups.</p
<p>Results of meta-analysis comparison of combined therapy and PDT monotherapy.</p
<p>Comparison of results from our analyses and from two MetaPhlAn based analyses.</p
Comparison of Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) scores of different combinations of our proposed approach.</...
<p>Results of t-tests (p-values) for comparison of mean performance measures.</p
Comparisons of clinical outcome between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
<p>Interventions compared, study objectives and main study conclusions of included studies.</p
Comparison of outcomes for continuous laboratory variables at week 48 between treatment groups.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Results of similarity assessment including details of attributes, analytical methods and the number ...
Comparison of the qualitative and quantitative results of all vaccine brands (N = 453).</p
<p>Comparison of efficacy between combined therapy and chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs alone.</p
<p>Comparison of the clinical effects between patients with complete VICC and partial VICC.</p
<p>A comparison of the effects among Analysis I, II, III and IV on each outcome in terms of the stat...
Outcome data at each posttreatment assessment point and results from pairwise comparisons between tr...
<p>Comparison of the scores before and after the intervention in the three groups.</p
<p>Results of meta-analysis comparison of combined therapy and PDT monotherapy.</p
<p>Comparison of results from our analyses and from two MetaPhlAn based analyses.</p
Comparison of Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) scores of different combinations of our proposed approach.</...
<p>Results of t-tests (p-values) for comparison of mean performance measures.</p
Comparisons of clinical outcome between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
<p>Interventions compared, study objectives and main study conclusions of included studies.</p
Comparison of outcomes for continuous laboratory variables at week 48 between treatment groups.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Results of similarity assessment including details of attributes, analytical methods and the number ...
Comparison of the qualitative and quantitative results of all vaccine brands (N = 453).</p
<p>Comparison of efficacy between combined therapy and chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs alone.</p
<p>Comparison of the clinical effects between patients with complete VICC and partial VICC.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG