(a) Marked image. (b) Tampered image. (c) Tampered regions. (d) Second-stage detection of Hu et al.’s method. (e) First-stage recovery of Hu et al.’s method. (f) Second-stage recovery of Hu et al.’s method. (g) Second-stage detection of the proposed method. (h) First-stage recovery of the proposed method. (i) Second-stage recovery of the proposed method.</p
<p>Figure (a) shows the experimental results in part I) and figure (b) shows the ones in part II). I...
<p>Comparison of the detection results from different state-of-the-art methods for nuclei of periphe...
<p>Comparison of the obtained results for the different detection algorithms (considering all the sa...
(a) Marked image. (b) Tampered image. (c) Tampered regions. (d) Second-stage detection of Hu et al.’...
(a) First-stage recovery τ = 2,ψ= 7. (b) First-stage recovery τ = 3,ψ = 5. (c) First-stage recovery ...
(a) Tampered Jet image. (b) First stage detection. (c) Second stage detection.</p
<p>Comparisons of tampering detection results and tampering recovery results under collaging attack....
Comparison of relevant results: (a) damaged images, (b) Darabi’s results [20], (c) Barnes’ results [...
(a-1)∼(e-1) the original images; (a-2)∼(e-2) the corresponding watermarked images; (a-3)∼(e-3) the t...
<p>Comparison of tampering detection results and tampering recovery results under mean attack.</p
<p>A: The original first time point image. B: Linearly registered second time point image. Note that...
<p>From top to bottom: chest CT experiment, lung CT experiment, stomach CT (1) experiment, stomach C...
Comparison of results obtained with sieving method and image-based method (C = 0.85) (%).</p
The superiority demonstration of our proposed scheme on image ‘lena’; (a) original image; (b) corres...
Most digital forgeries use an interpolation function, affecting the underlying statistical distribut...
<p>Figure (a) shows the experimental results in part I) and figure (b) shows the ones in part II). I...
<p>Comparison of the detection results from different state-of-the-art methods for nuclei of periphe...
<p>Comparison of the obtained results for the different detection algorithms (considering all the sa...
(a) Marked image. (b) Tampered image. (c) Tampered regions. (d) Second-stage detection of Hu et al.’...
(a) First-stage recovery τ = 2,ψ= 7. (b) First-stage recovery τ = 3,ψ = 5. (c) First-stage recovery ...
(a) Tampered Jet image. (b) First stage detection. (c) Second stage detection.</p
<p>Comparisons of tampering detection results and tampering recovery results under collaging attack....
Comparison of relevant results: (a) damaged images, (b) Darabi’s results [20], (c) Barnes’ results [...
(a-1)∼(e-1) the original images; (a-2)∼(e-2) the corresponding watermarked images; (a-3)∼(e-3) the t...
<p>Comparison of tampering detection results and tampering recovery results under mean attack.</p
<p>A: The original first time point image. B: Linearly registered second time point image. Note that...
<p>From top to bottom: chest CT experiment, lung CT experiment, stomach CT (1) experiment, stomach C...
Comparison of results obtained with sieving method and image-based method (C = 0.85) (%).</p
The superiority demonstration of our proposed scheme on image ‘lena’; (a) original image; (b) corres...
Most digital forgeries use an interpolation function, affecting the underlying statistical distribut...
<p>Figure (a) shows the experimental results in part I) and figure (b) shows the ones in part II). I...
<p>Comparison of the detection results from different state-of-the-art methods for nuclei of periphe...
<p>Comparison of the obtained results for the different detection algorithms (considering all the sa...