<p><sup>1</sup> Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2 selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3 ascertainment of exposure; 4 demonstration that outcome interest was not present at start of study; 5 comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis; 6 assessment of outcome; 7 was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur; 8 adequacy of follow-up cohorts</p><p><sup>a</sup> Studies that controlled for age received one score, whereas studies that controlled for other important confounders received an additional score</p><p><sup>b</sup> Study with follow-up time >5 years was assigned one score</p><p><sup>c</sup> Study with follow-up rate >70% was assigned one score</p><p>Assessment of study quality<a href="http://www.plosone.o...
1<p>Maximum of 4 stars for: representativeness of the exposed cohort; selection of the non-exposed c...
<p>*1 indicates case definition or ascertainment of exposure; 2, representativeness of the cases or ...
*<p>One point score for meeting each of the following items (if data were not available in the artic...
<p>1. Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2.Selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3.Ascertainme...
<p>1, indicates case definition and appropriate diagnosis; 2, consecutive patients or cases have a g...
*<p>Selection:</p><p>(1) Representativeness of the exposed cohort: A, truly representative; B, somew...
1<p>A cohort study with a follow-up time >8 y was assigned one star.</p>2<p>A cohort study with a fo...
<p>Note: A study can be given a maximum of one star for each item with the Selection and Outcome cat...
<p>Symbol ✓ indicates the measure was adequately addressed in the study; NR = not report; NA = not a...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses pool data from individual studies to generate a higher level of...
<p>(1) End points: A, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; B, no description about endpoin...
Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses pool data from individual studies to generate a higher level of...
<p>Quality of evidence from individual studies included in the meta-analysis<a href="http://www.plos...
Evaluating the quality of primary studies is a key step in meta-analytic reviews to reduce the risk ...
<p>*a maximum of 1 point for each item</p><p>**a maximum of 2 points for each item</p><p>***a maximu...
1<p>Maximum of 4 stars for: representativeness of the exposed cohort; selection of the non-exposed c...
<p>*1 indicates case definition or ascertainment of exposure; 2, representativeness of the cases or ...
*<p>One point score for meeting each of the following items (if data were not available in the artic...
<p>1. Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2.Selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3.Ascertainme...
<p>1, indicates case definition and appropriate diagnosis; 2, consecutive patients or cases have a g...
*<p>Selection:</p><p>(1) Representativeness of the exposed cohort: A, truly representative; B, somew...
1<p>A cohort study with a follow-up time >8 y was assigned one star.</p>2<p>A cohort study with a fo...
<p>Note: A study can be given a maximum of one star for each item with the Selection and Outcome cat...
<p>Symbol ✓ indicates the measure was adequately addressed in the study; NR = not report; NA = not a...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses pool data from individual studies to generate a higher level of...
<p>(1) End points: A, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; B, no description about endpoin...
Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses pool data from individual studies to generate a higher level of...
<p>Quality of evidence from individual studies included in the meta-analysis<a href="http://www.plos...
Evaluating the quality of primary studies is a key step in meta-analytic reviews to reduce the risk ...
<p>*a maximum of 1 point for each item</p><p>**a maximum of 2 points for each item</p><p>***a maximu...
1<p>Maximum of 4 stars for: representativeness of the exposed cohort; selection of the non-exposed c...
<p>*1 indicates case definition or ascertainment of exposure; 2, representativeness of the cases or ...
*<p>One point score for meeting each of the following items (if data were not available in the artic...