1<p>Maximum of 4 stars for: representativeness of the exposed cohort; selection of the non-exposed cohort; ascertainment of exposure; and demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study.</p>2<p>Maximum of 2 stars for: comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis.</p>3<p>Maximum of 3 stars for: assessment of outcome; was follow-up long enough for outcome to occur; and adequacy of follow-up of cohorts.</p><p>NR not reported.</p
<p>Note: For case-control studies, 1 indicates adequate definition of cases; 2, cases are representa...
<p><sup>a</sup> Not selected because of potential overlap with Karamanos (2014).</p><p><sup>b</sup> ...
<p><i>0–3 low quality</i></p><p><i>4–5 intermediate quality</i></p><p><i>6–7 high quality</i></p><p>...
<p>1. Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2.Selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3.Ascertainme...
<p>*a maximum of 1 point for each item</p><p>**a maximum of 2 points for each item</p><p>***a maximu...
<p>(1) End points: A, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; B, no description about endpoin...
*<p>Selection:</p><p>(1) Representativeness of the exposed cohort: A, truly representative; B, somew...
<p>*1 indicates case definition or ascertainment of exposure; 2, representativeness of the cases or ...
<p><sup>1</sup> Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2 selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3 a...
<p><b>Assessment strategies</b>: selection (max. 4 stars), comparability (max. 2 stars), and outcome...
<p><sup>1</sup>For cross-sectional and case-control studies. <sup>2</sup>For case-control study only...
<p>NR, not reported.</p>a<p>Indicates exposed cohort truly representative.</p>b<p>Non-exposed cohort...
<p>Note: A study can be given a maximum of one star for each item with the Selection and Outcome cat...
<p>a The outcome assessors were not blinded to the interventions implemented in any of the studies.<...
<p>S1: Selection1-is the case definition adequate; S2: Selection2-representativeness of the cases; S...
<p>Note: For case-control studies, 1 indicates adequate definition of cases; 2, cases are representa...
<p><sup>a</sup> Not selected because of potential overlap with Karamanos (2014).</p><p><sup>b</sup> ...
<p><i>0–3 low quality</i></p><p><i>4–5 intermediate quality</i></p><p><i>6–7 high quality</i></p><p>...
<p>1. Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2.Selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3.Ascertainme...
<p>*a maximum of 1 point for each item</p><p>**a maximum of 2 points for each item</p><p>***a maximu...
<p>(1) End points: A, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; B, no description about endpoin...
*<p>Selection:</p><p>(1) Representativeness of the exposed cohort: A, truly representative; B, somew...
<p>*1 indicates case definition or ascertainment of exposure; 2, representativeness of the cases or ...
<p><sup>1</sup> Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2 selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3 a...
<p><b>Assessment strategies</b>: selection (max. 4 stars), comparability (max. 2 stars), and outcome...
<p><sup>1</sup>For cross-sectional and case-control studies. <sup>2</sup>For case-control study only...
<p>NR, not reported.</p>a<p>Indicates exposed cohort truly representative.</p>b<p>Non-exposed cohort...
<p>Note: A study can be given a maximum of one star for each item with the Selection and Outcome cat...
<p>a The outcome assessors were not blinded to the interventions implemented in any of the studies.<...
<p>S1: Selection1-is the case definition adequate; S2: Selection2-representativeness of the cases; S...
<p>Note: For case-control studies, 1 indicates adequate definition of cases; 2, cases are representa...
<p><sup>a</sup> Not selected because of potential overlap with Karamanos (2014).</p><p><sup>b</sup> ...
<p><i>0–3 low quality</i></p><p><i>4–5 intermediate quality</i></p><p><i>6–7 high quality</i></p><p>...