<p>(1) End points: A, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; B, no description about endpoints; C, endpoints inappropriate to the aim of the study. (2) Follow-up period: A, follow-up appropriate to the aim of the study; B, follow-up was not mentioned; C, follow-up in appropriate to the aim of the study. (3) Loss to follow-up: A, loss to follow-up less than 5%; B, no description about the loss; C, loss to follow-up over than 5%; (4) Control group: A, an adequate control group; B, no description about control group; (5) Contemporary groups: A, control and studied groups were managed during the same time period; B, no description about the time period of groups; C, control and studied groups were historical comparison. (6) Baseline of ...
<p><i>Note.</i> Item description: A; question/objective clearly described, B; design evident and app...
#<p>0 = not reported; 1 = reported but inadequate; 2 = reported and adequate;</p><p>*0 for nonrandom...
Background: Existing study quality and risk of bias lists for observational studies have important d...
*<p>1 indicates case definition and diagnostic appropriate; 2, consecutive patients or case having a...
<p>1, indicates case definition and appropriate diagnosis; 2, consecutive patients or cases have a g...
a<p>Was randomization performed?</p>b<p>Were the groups similar at baseline regarding important prog...
<p>*1 indicates case definition or ascertainment of exposure; 2, representativeness of the cases or ...
<p>1. Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2.Selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3.Ascertainme...
<p>Quality assessment of included studies: Risk of bias (A) and overall assessment of risk of bias (...
<p><i>Note.</i> Item description: A; question/objective sufficiently described, B; study design evid...
<p>*a maximum of 1 point for each item</p><p>**a maximum of 2 points for each item</p><p>***a maximu...
<p>Note:—no star † cohort study ‡ case-control study</p><p>Quality assessment of included studies.</...
1<p>Maximum of 4 stars for: representativeness of the exposed cohort; selection of the non-exposed c...
<p>: The item is met.</p><p>○: The item is not met.</p><p>1. Describe the locations.</p><p>2. Descri...
<p><sup>1</sup> Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2 selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3 a...
<p><i>Note.</i> Item description: A; question/objective clearly described, B; design evident and app...
#<p>0 = not reported; 1 = reported but inadequate; 2 = reported and adequate;</p><p>*0 for nonrandom...
Background: Existing study quality and risk of bias lists for observational studies have important d...
*<p>1 indicates case definition and diagnostic appropriate; 2, consecutive patients or case having a...
<p>1, indicates case definition and appropriate diagnosis; 2, consecutive patients or cases have a g...
a<p>Was randomization performed?</p>b<p>Were the groups similar at baseline regarding important prog...
<p>*1 indicates case definition or ascertainment of exposure; 2, representativeness of the cases or ...
<p>1. Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2.Selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3.Ascertainme...
<p>Quality assessment of included studies: Risk of bias (A) and overall assessment of risk of bias (...
<p><i>Note.</i> Item description: A; question/objective sufficiently described, B; study design evid...
<p>*a maximum of 1 point for each item</p><p>**a maximum of 2 points for each item</p><p>***a maximu...
<p>Note:—no star † cohort study ‡ case-control study</p><p>Quality assessment of included studies.</...
1<p>Maximum of 4 stars for: representativeness of the exposed cohort; selection of the non-exposed c...
<p>: The item is met.</p><p>○: The item is not met.</p><p>1. Describe the locations.</p><p>2. Descri...
<p><sup>1</sup> Representativeness of the exposed cohort; 2 selection of the non-exposed cohort; 3 a...
<p><i>Note.</i> Item description: A; question/objective clearly described, B; design evident and app...
#<p>0 = not reported; 1 = reported but inadequate; 2 = reported and adequate;</p><p>*0 for nonrandom...
Background: Existing study quality and risk of bias lists for observational studies have important d...