Classification accuracy of RF and SourceTracker using different sets of input features. On the left side of each plot is the RF classification accuracy with sets of 10 to 200 of the top-ranked features according to information gain (A), chi-square (B), and RF feature permutation (C) criteria. The right-hand side of each plot shows Source Trackerâs classification accuracy with all features. The four types of input features used were OTUs only (orange markers); OTUs and clades (green markers); functional predictions made using PICRUSt (purple markers); and all generated features (blue markers). (PDF 28 kb
Figure S1. The PCoA plot of The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) dataset, which is generat...
Correlation coefficients of genus composition of the Singer et al. mock community between theoretica...
Figure S5. Histogram of average distances within ortholog groups, including single- and multi-copy i...
The predictions on all samples: (a) SVM vs random forests, (b) SVM vs SourceTracker. The values on x...
Figure S1. Schematic representation of the hybridization capture method. Figure S2. Mock community p...
The performance of SVMs with different custom kernels. The distance metrics are ranked by their mean...
Table S4. Statistical differences in alpha diversity at different sequencing depths. (XLSX 10Â kb
Table S1. Sediment properties and ANOVA analysis among three groups. Table S2. Shannon diversity and...
Table S1. PERMANOVA analysis used to assess microbial community structure differences. Table S2. Med...
a Tree inferred by CSI Phylogeny pruning set to 10, contigs from day 1 used as reference. PDF. b Tre...
Figure S6. Taxonomic composition of bacterial mock community samples pre-filtering (a) and post-filt...
Summary of microbiome samples. Human oral cavity samples came from HMP with associated abbreviations...
Figure S6. Histogram of average distances within genome-matching and nonmatching single-copy eukaryo...
Taxonomic composition of samples. The relative abundance of each group in subgingival and supragingi...
Similarities in the OTUs that are classified as different families within the same order. (DOCX 20 k...
Figure S1. The PCoA plot of The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) dataset, which is generat...
Correlation coefficients of genus composition of the Singer et al. mock community between theoretica...
Figure S5. Histogram of average distances within ortholog groups, including single- and multi-copy i...
The predictions on all samples: (a) SVM vs random forests, (b) SVM vs SourceTracker. The values on x...
Figure S1. Schematic representation of the hybridization capture method. Figure S2. Mock community p...
The performance of SVMs with different custom kernels. The distance metrics are ranked by their mean...
Table S4. Statistical differences in alpha diversity at different sequencing depths. (XLSX 10Â kb
Table S1. Sediment properties and ANOVA analysis among three groups. Table S2. Shannon diversity and...
Table S1. PERMANOVA analysis used to assess microbial community structure differences. Table S2. Med...
a Tree inferred by CSI Phylogeny pruning set to 10, contigs from day 1 used as reference. PDF. b Tre...
Figure S6. Taxonomic composition of bacterial mock community samples pre-filtering (a) and post-filt...
Summary of microbiome samples. Human oral cavity samples came from HMP with associated abbreviations...
Figure S6. Histogram of average distances within genome-matching and nonmatching single-copy eukaryo...
Taxonomic composition of samples. The relative abundance of each group in subgingival and supragingi...
Similarities in the OTUs that are classified as different families within the same order. (DOCX 20 k...
Figure S1. The PCoA plot of The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) dataset, which is generat...
Correlation coefficients of genus composition of the Singer et al. mock community between theoretica...
Figure S5. Histogram of average distances within ortholog groups, including single- and multi-copy i...