<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent corrected at p < .05 (FWE corrected).</p
<p><i>Note</i>. Regions included in a single cluster are listed together. The spatial extent of each...
<p><i>Note:</i> All activations evident at a height threshold of <i>p<sub>FWE</sub></i> <.05; for...
<p>Regional activations related to [FtN, FtS, StN] contrasted to [FW, SW], initial voxel-height thre...
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Cluster sizes of commonly activated brain regions under the N-back task conditions in the control...
<p>All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 10 contiguous voxels and met the signif...
<p><i>Note</i>. Regions included in a single cluster are listed together. The spatial extent of each...
<p><b>A:</b> during Jumping to Conclusions (JTC) versus control blocks. <b>B:</b> at the time of las...
<p>(FDR <0.05 combined with cluster level corrected, FWE <0.05).</p><p>Notes: x, y, z indicate the M...
<p>Regions that showed greater activity at a voxel-level threshold of <i>p</i><.005 (uncorrected) an...
<p><i>Note</i>. Regions included in a single cluster are listed together. The spatial extent of each...
<p><i>Note:</i> All activations evident at a height threshold of <i>p<sub>FWE</sub></i> <.05; for...
<p>Regional activations related to [FtN, FtS, StN] contrasted to [FW, SW], initial voxel-height thre...
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Cluster sizes of commonly activated brain regions under the N-back task conditions in the control...
<p>All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 10 contiguous voxels and met the signif...
<p><i>Note</i>. Regions included in a single cluster are listed together. The spatial extent of each...
<p><b>A:</b> during Jumping to Conclusions (JTC) versus control blocks. <b>B:</b> at the time of las...
<p>(FDR <0.05 combined with cluster level corrected, FWE <0.05).</p><p>Notes: x, y, z indicate the M...
<p>Regions that showed greater activity at a voxel-level threshold of <i>p</i><.005 (uncorrected) an...
<p><i>Note</i>. Regions included in a single cluster are listed together. The spatial extent of each...
<p><i>Note:</i> All activations evident at a height threshold of <i>p<sub>FWE</sub></i> <.05; for...
<p>Regional activations related to [FtN, FtS, StN] contrasted to [FW, SW], initial voxel-height thre...
DOI
Add to ORKG