<p>Regions that showed greater activity at a voxel-level threshold of <i>p</i><.005 (uncorrected) and a cluster extent threshold of <i>p</i><.05 (corrected for the whole-brain) when performing the mental tasks compared with the implicit baseline.</p
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Regions where activity to experimental task hits was greater than the implicit baseline.</p
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Threshold of <i>Z</i> = 2.3 at voxel level and a cluster level corrected for the whole brain at <...
<p>Brain regions showing stronger responses during inhibition minus passive viewing condition (A), i...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...
Brain regions with significantly different FC between groups (voxel-level threshold: Uncorrected ppF...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR-corrected at the cluster level. Note: * p<0.005 and cluster...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Brain regions showing greater activation in the ego-blocking condition than the control condition...
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Regions where activity to experimental task hits was greater than the implicit baseline.</p
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Threshold of <i>Z</i> = 2.3 at voxel level and a cluster level corrected for the whole brain at <...
<p>Brain regions showing stronger responses during inhibition minus passive viewing condition (A), i...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...
Brain regions with significantly different FC between groups (voxel-level threshold: Uncorrected ppF...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR-corrected at the cluster level. Note: * p<0.005 and cluster...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Brain regions showing greater activation in the ego-blocking condition than the control condition...
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...