<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < .05 (FWE corrected).</p
<p>Reported clusters are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05 (FWE corrected) after applying a whole brain...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
Clusters were obtained at a voxel level threshold of p p < 0.05 (FWE corrected) to correct for multi...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 10 contiguous voxels and met the signif...
<p>Regional activations related to [FtN, FtS, StN] contrasted to [FW, SW], initial voxel-height thre...
<p>Regions that showed greater activity at a voxel-level threshold of <i>p</i><.005 (uncorrected) an...
<p>All reported peaks significant at p<0.05 whole-brain corrected (FDR) threshold.</p>†<p> = part of...
<p><i>Note:</i> All activations evident at a height threshold of <i>p<sub>FWE</sub></i> <.05; for...
<p>(FDR <0.05 combined with cluster level corrected, FWE <0.05).</p><p>Notes: x, y, z indicate the M...
<p>Reported clusters are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05 (FWE corrected) after applying a whole brain...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
Clusters were obtained at a voxel level threshold of p p < 0.05 (FWE corrected) to correct for multi...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>Cluster extent was considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster extent correc...
<p>All of the listed brain regions were cluster corrected at 10 contiguous voxels and met the signif...
<p>Regional activations related to [FtN, FtS, StN] contrasted to [FW, SW], initial voxel-height thre...
<p>Regions that showed greater activity at a voxel-level threshold of <i>p</i><.005 (uncorrected) an...
<p>All reported peaks significant at p<0.05 whole-brain corrected (FDR) threshold.</p>†<p> = part of...
<p><i>Note:</i> All activations evident at a height threshold of <i>p<sub>FWE</sub></i> <.05; for...
<p>(FDR <0.05 combined with cluster level corrected, FWE <0.05).</p><p>Notes: x, y, z indicate the M...
<p>Reported clusters are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05 (FWE corrected) after applying a whole brain...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
Clusters were obtained at a voxel level threshold of p p < 0.05 (FWE corrected) to correct for multi...
DOI
Add to ORKG