The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her sentence before any credits earned pursuant to the Credits statute apply to eligibility for parole. The Court disagreed with this argument and held that credits earned can factor-in for parole eligibility if the offender was sentenced under a state that requires a minimum term but does not explicitly mention parole eligibility
The Court determined whether a person who is serving a sentence of lifetime supervision may challeng...
This article addresses the impact of Alleyne v. United States on statutes that restrict an offender’...
The Court determined what process is constitutionally required when a district court sets bail in an...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
The Court confronted several issues in this methodical decision. The Court addressed standing and di...
The Nevada Parole Board can deny parole for any reason authorized by regulation or statute. However,...
NRS § 209.4465 does not allow for good time served to be credited for those who commit child lewdnes...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether the appellant Antonio Aldape could challenge the cond...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that (1) if collateral consequences of a criminal conviction exi...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
Following the 1989 session of the Washington Legislature, the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (B...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s order dismissing Floyd’s complaint which chal...
The Court determined whether a person who is serving a sentence of lifetime supervision may challeng...
This article addresses the impact of Alleyne v. United States on statutes that restrict an offender’...
The Court determined what process is constitutionally required when a district court sets bail in an...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
The Court confronted several issues in this methodical decision. The Court addressed standing and di...
The Nevada Parole Board can deny parole for any reason authorized by regulation or statute. However,...
NRS § 209.4465 does not allow for good time served to be credited for those who commit child lewdnes...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether the appellant Antonio Aldape could challenge the cond...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that (1) if collateral consequences of a criminal conviction exi...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
Following the 1989 session of the Washington Legislature, the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (B...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s order dismissing Floyd’s complaint which chal...
The Court determined whether a person who is serving a sentence of lifetime supervision may challeng...
This article addresses the impact of Alleyne v. United States on statutes that restrict an offender’...
The Court determined what process is constitutionally required when a district court sets bail in an...