Gene Garver\u27s recent book, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character and the Ethics of Belief (U. Chicago Press, 2004), responds to the dilemma at the core of contemporary legal theory. Garver incisively describes why legal reasoning is viewed either as impotent or dangerous. Reason appears impotent in the legal context to the extent that we maintain its rigor by limiting its scope to dialectical demonstration; it appears dangerous to the extent that we free reason from having to provide definitive answers. Garver looks to Aristotle for a solution. To deal with the inadequacies of the accounts of practical reasoning that draw only from the Nicomachean Ethics, he anchors his account equally in the Rhetoric. He concludes t...