Gene Garver\u27s recent book, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character and the Ethics of Belief (U. Chicago Press, 2004), responds to the dilemma at the core of contemporary legal theory. Garver incisively describes why legal reasoning is viewed either as impotent or dangerous. Reason appears impotent in the legal context to the extent that we maintain its rigor by limiting its scope to dialectical demonstration; it appears dangerous to the extent that we free reason from having to provide definitive answers. Garver looks to Aristotle for a solution. To deal with the inadequacies of the accounts of practical reasoning that draw only from the Nicomachean Ethics, he anchors his account equally in the Rhetoric. He concludes t...
Book review: For The Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief. By ...
Legal philosophy is viewed as irrelevant by virtually everyone except for legal philosophers. In thi...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
Gene Garver\u27s recent book, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character and the Ethi...
Eugene Garver\u27s For the Sake of Argument is a tremendously interesting book on one of the most im...
Book review: For The Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief. By ...
What role does reason play in our lives? What role should it play? And are claims to rationality lib...
In this major contribution to philosophy and rhetoric, Eugene Garver shows how Aristotle integrates ...
Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Critical Legal Theory has just been published by the Univ...
The article focuses on the difference between strategic rhetoric and philosophical conversation. It ...
A foreword to a symposium held to discuss Gene Garver’s book, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Re...
This dissertation is an attempt to articulate a response to what seems to be the greatest political ...
The great challenge of rhetorical argument is to make discourse ethical without making it less logic...
textThis dissertation explores how argumentation theory can supplement models of responsible persuas...
An approach commonly used to teach argument in English departments tacitly dichotomizes argument and...
Book review: For The Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief. By ...
Legal philosophy is viewed as irrelevant by virtually everyone except for legal philosophers. In thi...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
Gene Garver\u27s recent book, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character and the Ethi...
Eugene Garver\u27s For the Sake of Argument is a tremendously interesting book on one of the most im...
Book review: For The Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief. By ...
What role does reason play in our lives? What role should it play? And are claims to rationality lib...
In this major contribution to philosophy and rhetoric, Eugene Garver shows how Aristotle integrates ...
Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Critical Legal Theory has just been published by the Univ...
The article focuses on the difference between strategic rhetoric and philosophical conversation. It ...
A foreword to a symposium held to discuss Gene Garver’s book, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Re...
This dissertation is an attempt to articulate a response to what seems to be the greatest political ...
The great challenge of rhetorical argument is to make discourse ethical without making it less logic...
textThis dissertation explores how argumentation theory can supplement models of responsible persuas...
An approach commonly used to teach argument in English departments tacitly dichotomizes argument and...
Book review: For The Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief. By ...
Legal philosophy is viewed as irrelevant by virtually everyone except for legal philosophers. In thi...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...