We are neither as pessimistic nor as optimistic as Elqayam & Evans (E&E). The consequences of normativism have not been uniformly disastrous, even among the examples they consider. However, normativism won't be going away any time soon and in the literature on causal Bayes nets new debates about normativism are emerging. Finally, we suggest that to concentrate on expert reasoners as an antidote to normativism may limit the contribution of research on thinking to basic psychological science
In the study of human thinking, two main research questions can be asked: “Descriptive Q: What is hu...
This paper provides moderate criticism of so-called normative theories of thinking and reasoning. Th...
This paper argues that the goals people have when reasoning determine their own norms of reasoning. ...
We are neither as pessimistic nor as optimistic as Elqayam & Evans (E&E). The consequences of normat...
Our target article identified normativism as the view that rationality should be evaluated against u...
It has recently been argued that normative considerations play an important role in causal cognition...
Normative theories provide essential tools for understanding behaviour, not just for reasoning, judg...
This commentary questions EE\u2019s claims that thinking tasks are doomed to have multiple normative...
It has been suggested that evaluative normativity should be expunged from the psychology of reasonin...
The study examines the various limitations associated with using the normativism framework within th...
The rationality paradox centers on the observation that people are highly intelligent, yet show evid...
Norms—that is, specifications of what we ought to do—play a critical role in the study of informal a...
In “Rethinking Norm Psychology,” Cecilia Heyes offers an insightful critique of nativist approaches ...
We admire Heyes's attempt to develop a mechanistic account of norm cognition. Nonetheless, her accou...
We applaud many aspects of Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) call for a descriptivist research programme in s...
In the study of human thinking, two main research questions can be asked: “Descriptive Q: What is hu...
This paper provides moderate criticism of so-called normative theories of thinking and reasoning. Th...
This paper argues that the goals people have when reasoning determine their own norms of reasoning. ...
We are neither as pessimistic nor as optimistic as Elqayam & Evans (E&E). The consequences of normat...
Our target article identified normativism as the view that rationality should be evaluated against u...
It has recently been argued that normative considerations play an important role in causal cognition...
Normative theories provide essential tools for understanding behaviour, not just for reasoning, judg...
This commentary questions EE\u2019s claims that thinking tasks are doomed to have multiple normative...
It has been suggested that evaluative normativity should be expunged from the psychology of reasonin...
The study examines the various limitations associated with using the normativism framework within th...
The rationality paradox centers on the observation that people are highly intelligent, yet show evid...
Norms—that is, specifications of what we ought to do—play a critical role in the study of informal a...
In “Rethinking Norm Psychology,” Cecilia Heyes offers an insightful critique of nativist approaches ...
We admire Heyes's attempt to develop a mechanistic account of norm cognition. Nonetheless, her accou...
We applaud many aspects of Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) call for a descriptivist research programme in s...
In the study of human thinking, two main research questions can be asked: “Descriptive Q: What is hu...
This paper provides moderate criticism of so-called normative theories of thinking and reasoning. Th...
This paper argues that the goals people have when reasoning determine their own norms of reasoning. ...