In this paper we discuss some of the most important economic issues raised in European Commission vs. Microsoft (2004) concerning the market for work group servers. In our view, the most important economic issues relate to (a) foreclosure incentives and (b) innovation effects of the proposed remedy. We discuss the economic basis for the Commission’s claims that Microsoft had incentives to exclude rivals in the work group server market through degrading the interoperability of their server operating systems with Windows. We also examine the impact of compulsory disclosure of information on interoperability and argue that the effects on innovation are not unambiguously negative as Microsoft claim. We conclude with some general implications of...
On 24 March 2004, the European Commission found Microsoft Corporation guilty of violating Article 82...
The constant tension between intellectual property rights and competition policy has recently culmin...
Legal context This article examines whether the Court of First Instance ruling in Microsoft v Commis...
In this paper we discuss some of the most important economic issues raised in European Commission vs...
In this paper we discuss some of the most important economic issues raised in European Commission vs...
In this paper, we discuss the main economic aspects of the European Microsoft case; in particular, M...
The antitrust cases against Microsoft in the United States and Europe have been the most high profil...
The present work analyzes the interaction between antitrust policy and intellectual property protect...
In September 2007, the European Court of First Instance (CFI) ruled that Microsoft violated the Euro...
The present work analyzes the interaction between antitrust policy and intellectual property protect...
When will a monopolist have incentives to leverage her/his market power in a primary market to forec...
Master’s Thesis in Competition Policy Title: ”The Microsoft Case – A reflection on the tying of Wind...
When will a monopolist have incentives to foreclose a complementary market by degrading compatibilit...
YesThe Microsoft Case is a battle between Microsoft, the global software giant, and the European Com...
In August 2008, the Polish Competition and Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) referred to the Euro...
On 24 March 2004, the European Commission found Microsoft Corporation guilty of violating Article 82...
The constant tension between intellectual property rights and competition policy has recently culmin...
Legal context This article examines whether the Court of First Instance ruling in Microsoft v Commis...
In this paper we discuss some of the most important economic issues raised in European Commission vs...
In this paper we discuss some of the most important economic issues raised in European Commission vs...
In this paper, we discuss the main economic aspects of the European Microsoft case; in particular, M...
The antitrust cases against Microsoft in the United States and Europe have been the most high profil...
The present work analyzes the interaction between antitrust policy and intellectual property protect...
In September 2007, the European Court of First Instance (CFI) ruled that Microsoft violated the Euro...
The present work analyzes the interaction between antitrust policy and intellectual property protect...
When will a monopolist have incentives to leverage her/his market power in a primary market to forec...
Master’s Thesis in Competition Policy Title: ”The Microsoft Case – A reflection on the tying of Wind...
When will a monopolist have incentives to foreclose a complementary market by degrading compatibilit...
YesThe Microsoft Case is a battle between Microsoft, the global software giant, and the European Com...
In August 2008, the Polish Competition and Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) referred to the Euro...
On 24 March 2004, the European Commission found Microsoft Corporation guilty of violating Article 82...
The constant tension between intellectual property rights and competition policy has recently culmin...
Legal context This article examines whether the Court of First Instance ruling in Microsoft v Commis...