In criminal law, foresight betrays a guilty mind as much as intent does: both reveal that the agent is not properly motivated to avoid an illegal state of affairs. This commonality warrants our judgment that the state is brought about intentionally, even when unintended. In contrast to Knobe. I thus retain the idea that acting intentionally is acting with a certain frame of mind
Contemporary American Criminal Law, as represented by the American Law Institute's Model Penal Code,...
Understanding the relationship between the mind and the body requires understanding both the influen...
In this chapter, we explore the potential influence that advances in neuroscience may have on legal ...
In criminal law, foresight betrays a guilty mind as much as intent does: both reveal that the agent ...
A central tenet of Anglo-American penal law is that in order for an actor to be found criminally lia...
Mistake about or ignorance of the law does not exculpate in criminal law, except in limited circumst...
In this paper, I first review some of the recent empirical work on the biasing effect that moral con...
A coherent practice of mens rea ('guilty mind') ascription in criminal law presupposes a concept of ...
Blameworthiness, in the criminal law context, is conceived as the carefully calculated end product o...
The conventional view is that a result is intended if it is motivationally significant - i.e., if it...
Butler's and Knobe's cases appear to show that our attributions of intentional actions are sensitive...
In criminal law, the mental state of the defendant is a crucial determinant of the grade of crime th...
Several studies have shown that people are more likely to attribute intentionality and blame to agen...
This article explores the notion of guilt understood as one of the conditions required to attribute ...
It has been argued that the attribution of intentional actions is sensitive to our moral judgment. I...
Contemporary American Criminal Law, as represented by the American Law Institute's Model Penal Code,...
Understanding the relationship between the mind and the body requires understanding both the influen...
In this chapter, we explore the potential influence that advances in neuroscience may have on legal ...
In criminal law, foresight betrays a guilty mind as much as intent does: both reveal that the agent ...
A central tenet of Anglo-American penal law is that in order for an actor to be found criminally lia...
Mistake about or ignorance of the law does not exculpate in criminal law, except in limited circumst...
In this paper, I first review some of the recent empirical work on the biasing effect that moral con...
A coherent practice of mens rea ('guilty mind') ascription in criminal law presupposes a concept of ...
Blameworthiness, in the criminal law context, is conceived as the carefully calculated end product o...
The conventional view is that a result is intended if it is motivationally significant - i.e., if it...
Butler's and Knobe's cases appear to show that our attributions of intentional actions are sensitive...
In criminal law, the mental state of the defendant is a crucial determinant of the grade of crime th...
Several studies have shown that people are more likely to attribute intentionality and blame to agen...
This article explores the notion of guilt understood as one of the conditions required to attribute ...
It has been argued that the attribution of intentional actions is sensitive to our moral judgment. I...
Contemporary American Criminal Law, as represented by the American Law Institute's Model Penal Code,...
Understanding the relationship between the mind and the body requires understanding both the influen...
In this chapter, we explore the potential influence that advances in neuroscience may have on legal ...
DOI
Add to ORKG