Add to ORKGThe Court determined that the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A. decision, extinguishing first security interests, applies retroactively to all foreclosures occurring prior to the date of the decision and since NRS 116.3116’s inception
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether a quiet title action from a foreclosure sale was barr...
The Court determined the proper interpretation of NRS 40.455(1), and applied it in a claim for a def...
The Court determined that the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A. decision, extinguishing...
This Court has previously held that the Federal Foreclosure Bar preempts NRS 116. 3116 and that a fi...
The Court determined that (1) an HOA receives a true superpriority lien on a homeowner’s property un...
The Court determined that prior to its 2015 amendment, NRS § 116.31168, through its incorporation of...
The Court determined that, under provisions of NRS 116.31162, when an HOA records a notice of a fore...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
When a court grants retroactive annulment for an automatic bankruptcy stay on a property, a sale of ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that becausethe holder of the first deed of trust provided valid tender of the ...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
The Court held that a servicer of a loan that is owned by a regulated entity does have standing to r...
Plaintiff held bonds secured by a trust mortgage. The trustee, Moore, without the consent of all the...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether a quiet title action from a foreclosure sale was barr...
The Court determined the proper interpretation of NRS 40.455(1), and applied it in a claim for a def...
The Court determined that the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A. decision, extinguishing...
This Court has previously held that the Federal Foreclosure Bar preempts NRS 116. 3116 and that a fi...
The Court determined that (1) an HOA receives a true superpriority lien on a homeowner’s property un...
The Court determined that prior to its 2015 amendment, NRS § 116.31168, through its incorporation of...
The Court determined that, under provisions of NRS 116.31162, when an HOA records a notice of a fore...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
When a court grants retroactive annulment for an automatic bankruptcy stay on a property, a sale of ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that becausethe holder of the first deed of trust provided valid tender of the ...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
The Court held that a servicer of a loan that is owned by a regulated entity does have standing to r...
Plaintiff held bonds secured by a trust mortgage. The trustee, Moore, without the consent of all the...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether a quiet title action from a foreclosure sale was barr...
The Court determined the proper interpretation of NRS 40.455(1), and applied it in a claim for a def...