Texas has rights to Red River water pursuant to the Red River Compact, approved by all basin states and Congress. Texas wants to divert a portion of its allocation in Oklahoma, which has passed a statute banning the export of water. This case will decide (1) whether Texas’s compact rights include the right to divert water in Oklahoma, and (2) whether Oklahoma’s effort to prohibit that diversion violates the Dormant Commerce Clause
It is the constitutional duty of the State of Texas to conserve and develop the state’s water resour...
In 1976, the United States Supreme Court decided Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Unite...
The states of Colorado and New Mexico agreed by compact on a division of the water of the La Plata r...
Texas has rights to Red River water pursuant to the Red River Compact, approved by all basin states ...
On June 13, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in a “Red River Rivalr...
As Texas’s population continues growing, the state is struggling to forestall a looming water crisis...
The purpose of this essay is to familiarize readers with the facts and background of these issues in...
The 1949 Pecos River Compact allocates the river’s water between Texas and New Mexico. In an earlier...
With the arrival of the twentieth century, technology allowed surface water supplies to be used by c...
Facing water shortages, states struggle with competing impulses, desiring to restrict water exports ...
In 1938, Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado signed the Rio Grande Compact, establishing terms of apport...
If oil were involved, rather than water, Texas law provides the landowner absolute ownership of all ...
The City of Hugo, Oklahoma, entered into a contract with the City of Irving, Texas, for the sale of ...
Economic development in Oklahoma and Texas has often involved one state's efforts to snatch companie...
Document: 88th Congress, 1st Session, Senate, Document No. 20, Determination of the Rights of the St...
It is the constitutional duty of the State of Texas to conserve and develop the state’s water resour...
In 1976, the United States Supreme Court decided Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Unite...
The states of Colorado and New Mexico agreed by compact on a division of the water of the La Plata r...
Texas has rights to Red River water pursuant to the Red River Compact, approved by all basin states ...
On June 13, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in a “Red River Rivalr...
As Texas’s population continues growing, the state is struggling to forestall a looming water crisis...
The purpose of this essay is to familiarize readers with the facts and background of these issues in...
The 1949 Pecos River Compact allocates the river’s water between Texas and New Mexico. In an earlier...
With the arrival of the twentieth century, technology allowed surface water supplies to be used by c...
Facing water shortages, states struggle with competing impulses, desiring to restrict water exports ...
In 1938, Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado signed the Rio Grande Compact, establishing terms of apport...
If oil were involved, rather than water, Texas law provides the landowner absolute ownership of all ...
The City of Hugo, Oklahoma, entered into a contract with the City of Irving, Texas, for the sale of ...
Economic development in Oklahoma and Texas has often involved one state's efforts to snatch companie...
Document: 88th Congress, 1st Session, Senate, Document No. 20, Determination of the Rights of the St...
It is the constitutional duty of the State of Texas to conserve and develop the state’s water resour...
In 1976, the United States Supreme Court decided Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Unite...
The states of Colorado and New Mexico agreed by compact on a division of the water of the La Plata r...