Texas has rights to Red River water pursuant to the Red River Compact, approved by all basin states and Congress. Texas wants to divert a portion of its allocation in Oklahoma, which has passed a statute banning the export of water. This case will decide (1) whether Texas’s compact rights include the right to divert water in Oklahoma, and (2) whether Oklahoma’s effort to prohibit that diversion violates the Dormant Commerce Clause
Until relatively recent years water rights legislation and litigation has primarily centered in the ...
In Texas, water is on everyone’s minds. Between a raging drought, an expanding oil and gas industry,...
If oil were involved, rather than water, Texas law provides the landowner absolute ownership of all ...
Texas has rights to Red River water pursuant to the Red River Compact, approved by all basin states ...
On June 13, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in a “Red River Rivalr...
As Texas’s population continues growing, the state is struggling to forestall a looming water crisis...
The 1949 Pecos River Compact allocates the river’s water between Texas and New Mexico. In an earlier...
The purpose of this essay is to familiarize readers with the facts and background of these issues in...
With the arrival of the twentieth century, technology allowed surface water supplies to be used by c...
Attempts to alter water use agreements, especially those spanning back decades or even centuries, el...
In 1938, Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado signed the Rio Grande Compact, establishing terms of apport...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Kansas v. Nebraska & Colorado. The Supreme ...
In 1976, the United States Supreme Court decided Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Unite...
It is the constitutional duty of the State of Texas to conserve and develop the state’s water resour...
This casenote addresses a decision of the Colorado Water Court interpreting whether the federal rese...
Until relatively recent years water rights legislation and litigation has primarily centered in the ...
In Texas, water is on everyone’s minds. Between a raging drought, an expanding oil and gas industry,...
If oil were involved, rather than water, Texas law provides the landowner absolute ownership of all ...
Texas has rights to Red River water pursuant to the Red River Compact, approved by all basin states ...
On June 13, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in a “Red River Rivalr...
As Texas’s population continues growing, the state is struggling to forestall a looming water crisis...
The 1949 Pecos River Compact allocates the river’s water between Texas and New Mexico. In an earlier...
The purpose of this essay is to familiarize readers with the facts and background of these issues in...
With the arrival of the twentieth century, technology allowed surface water supplies to be used by c...
Attempts to alter water use agreements, especially those spanning back decades or even centuries, el...
In 1938, Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado signed the Rio Grande Compact, establishing terms of apport...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Kansas v. Nebraska & Colorado. The Supreme ...
In 1976, the United States Supreme Court decided Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Unite...
It is the constitutional duty of the State of Texas to conserve and develop the state’s water resour...
This casenote addresses a decision of the Colorado Water Court interpreting whether the federal rese...
Until relatively recent years water rights legislation and litigation has primarily centered in the ...
In Texas, water is on everyone’s minds. Between a raging drought, an expanding oil and gas industry,...
If oil were involved, rather than water, Texas law provides the landowner absolute ownership of all ...