In the federal income tax code, there is a marriage penalty resulting from tax brackets that do not double upon marriage. This marriage penalty persists despite universal condemnation of it, penalizing a significant portion of married women who work and many same-sex couples. This Article proposes a novel way to deal with this marriage penalty by creating a filing status for dual income couples that earn an amount within a particular percentage of each other. This filing status would be the same as the current married filing status, except it would double the rates of single filers by accommodating two incomes. This approach represents a break from the status quo of only separating single taxpayers from married ones, which fails to consid...
This report provides background and analysis of the Federal Income Tax and the treatment of married ...
Many government programs have implicit penalties or subsidies for marriage. For example, many couple...
The 2013 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of ...
In the federal income tax code, there is a marriage penalty resulting from tax brackets that do not ...
Our progressive tax rate structure is aimed at taxing citizens fairly and based on their ability to ...
Tax scholarship has long struggled with whether married taxpayers should be taxed differently from u...
The tax law treats married and unmarried taxpayers differently in several respects. Married persons,...
Although both marriage penalties and marriage bonuses exist at all income levels under the federal i...
This article explores the present tax rate structure and its implications, considers the historical ...
Joint tax returns have generated controversy for many years. Married couples with the same joint inc...
In 1975 Professor Boris Bittker wrote a comprehensive article entitled Federal Income Taxation and t...
With the sunset of marriage penalty relief in 2025, Congress has a bittersweet opportunity to align ...
FORUM ON MARRIED WOMEN AND THE INCOME TAX: MARRIAGE PENALTIES AND MARRIAGE BONUSES OF THE 105 H CONG...
Professor Motro argues against current federal tax policy permitting married couples joint filing st...
I examine the effect of marriage penalties in the US income tax system on marital status. I construc...
This report provides background and analysis of the Federal Income Tax and the treatment of married ...
Many government programs have implicit penalties or subsidies for marriage. For example, many couple...
The 2013 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of ...
In the federal income tax code, there is a marriage penalty resulting from tax brackets that do not ...
Our progressive tax rate structure is aimed at taxing citizens fairly and based on their ability to ...
Tax scholarship has long struggled with whether married taxpayers should be taxed differently from u...
The tax law treats married and unmarried taxpayers differently in several respects. Married persons,...
Although both marriage penalties and marriage bonuses exist at all income levels under the federal i...
This article explores the present tax rate structure and its implications, considers the historical ...
Joint tax returns have generated controversy for many years. Married couples with the same joint inc...
In 1975 Professor Boris Bittker wrote a comprehensive article entitled Federal Income Taxation and t...
With the sunset of marriage penalty relief in 2025, Congress has a bittersweet opportunity to align ...
FORUM ON MARRIED WOMEN AND THE INCOME TAX: MARRIAGE PENALTIES AND MARRIAGE BONUSES OF THE 105 H CONG...
Professor Motro argues against current federal tax policy permitting married couples joint filing st...
I examine the effect of marriage penalties in the US income tax system on marital status. I construc...
This report provides background and analysis of the Federal Income Tax and the treatment of married ...
Many government programs have implicit penalties or subsidies for marriage. For example, many couple...
The 2013 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of ...