Many government programs have implicit penalties or subsidies for marriage. For example, many couples pay higher income taxes when married than their combined tax liabilities as single filers, while many other couples receive a marriage subsidy because their joint taxes fall with marriage. Likewise, most low-income couples are eligible for higher welfare benefits if they are separated rather than married. This article discusses the marriage penalty, with a particular focus on tax and transfer programs. Why does it exist? Who faces it? To what extent does it affect marriage and labor market behavior? What tradeoffs are involved in reducing it?
In 2000, the EITC will increase marriage penalties by at least $3.1 billion (10.4 percent) and reduc...
Marriage is no longer what it once was. Since the 1970\u27s, and accelerating in recent decades, the...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply eit...
Although both marriage penalties and marriage bonuses exist at all income levels under the federal i...
Our progressive tax rate structure is aimed at taxing citizens fairly and based on their ability to ...
In the federal income tax code, there is a marriage penalty resulting from tax brackets that do not ...
Tax scholarship has long struggled with whether married taxpayers should be taxed differently from u...
FORUM ON MARRIED WOMEN AND THE INCOME TAX: MARRIAGE PENALTIES AND MARRIAGE BONUSES OF THE 105 H CONG...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply eit...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply eit...
I examine the effect of marriage penalties in the US income tax system on marital status. I construc...
This document offers a brief examination of the key policy issues surrounding the EITC and marriage ...
This article analyzes the effects of differential tax treatment of married and single individuals in...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply ei...
The issue of same-sex marriage legalization is increasingly part of the national political dialogue....
In 2000, the EITC will increase marriage penalties by at least $3.1 billion (10.4 percent) and reduc...
Marriage is no longer what it once was. Since the 1970\u27s, and accelerating in recent decades, the...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply eit...
Although both marriage penalties and marriage bonuses exist at all income levels under the federal i...
Our progressive tax rate structure is aimed at taxing citizens fairly and based on their ability to ...
In the federal income tax code, there is a marriage penalty resulting from tax brackets that do not ...
Tax scholarship has long struggled with whether married taxpayers should be taxed differently from u...
FORUM ON MARRIED WOMEN AND THE INCOME TAX: MARRIAGE PENALTIES AND MARRIAGE BONUSES OF THE 105 H CONG...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply eit...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply eit...
I examine the effect of marriage penalties in the US income tax system on marital status. I construc...
This document offers a brief examination of the key policy issues surrounding the EITC and marriage ...
This article analyzes the effects of differential tax treatment of married and single individuals in...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply ei...
The issue of same-sex marriage legalization is increasingly part of the national political dialogue....
In 2000, the EITC will increase marriage penalties by at least $3.1 billion (10.4 percent) and reduc...
Marriage is no longer what it once was. Since the 1970\u27s, and accelerating in recent decades, the...
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply eit...