The chapter analyses the controversial issue of the legitimacy of the claims over Antarctic marine areas. In particular, the declaration of EEZ and extension of Continental Shelf, made in accordance with international law of the sea, may appear to be in conflict with the object and purpose of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. States' need of natural resources may raise disputes between the 7 States claiming sovereignty rights over Antarctic territories and other countries that consider the South Pole as an area of interest for the humankind as a whole
Reviews various elements of the region's legal regime, beginning with the 1959 Antarctic Treaty and ...
One day inside its 10-year deadline, Australia made a submission to the Commission on the Limits of ...
Since the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, the southern continent has often been lauded as the last “unowne...
The chapter analyses the controversial issue of the legitimacy of the claims over Antarctic marine a...
This study examines the legitimacy of the various national territorial claims that have been asserte...
The law of the sea recognizes the different powers of States with respect to the diverse maritime ar...
Australia will include the Australian Antarctic Territory in its November 2004 submission to the Com...
Australia will include the Australian Antarctic Territory in its November 2004 submission to the Com...
The governance of the Australia Antarctic Territory (AAT) and Australia\u27s broader interests in An...
When the Antarctic Treaty was concluded in 1959 it was primarily intended to exclude the possibility...
Article IV of the Antarctic Treaty is mainly aimed at freezing the status of Antarctica at the time ...
Major issues and complexities arise when one is looking at the international puzzle that is Antarcti...
In addition to the right to a continental shelf off their coasts, coastal States may approach the Co...
In the first half Of the twentieth Century, seven states made claims, in some instances conflicting ...
The recent assertion of maritime adjudicative jurisdiction by Australian courts over a Japanese wh...
Reviews various elements of the region's legal regime, beginning with the 1959 Antarctic Treaty and ...
One day inside its 10-year deadline, Australia made a submission to the Commission on the Limits of ...
Since the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, the southern continent has often been lauded as the last “unowne...
The chapter analyses the controversial issue of the legitimacy of the claims over Antarctic marine a...
This study examines the legitimacy of the various national territorial claims that have been asserte...
The law of the sea recognizes the different powers of States with respect to the diverse maritime ar...
Australia will include the Australian Antarctic Territory in its November 2004 submission to the Com...
Australia will include the Australian Antarctic Territory in its November 2004 submission to the Com...
The governance of the Australia Antarctic Territory (AAT) and Australia\u27s broader interests in An...
When the Antarctic Treaty was concluded in 1959 it was primarily intended to exclude the possibility...
Article IV of the Antarctic Treaty is mainly aimed at freezing the status of Antarctica at the time ...
Major issues and complexities arise when one is looking at the international puzzle that is Antarcti...
In addition to the right to a continental shelf off their coasts, coastal States may approach the Co...
In the first half Of the twentieth Century, seven states made claims, in some instances conflicting ...
The recent assertion of maritime adjudicative jurisdiction by Australian courts over a Japanese wh...
Reviews various elements of the region's legal regime, beginning with the 1959 Antarctic Treaty and ...
One day inside its 10-year deadline, Australia made a submission to the Commission on the Limits of ...
Since the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, the southern continent has often been lauded as the last “unowne...