The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the district court that found Appellant had breached her fiduciary duty when she withheld assets from entering a trust created for her children, the Respondents. The Court found that the mother had insufficient evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact that she owned 100% of a trust created by her parents when her children were slated to receive 65% of said trust from their grandparents. The Court affirmed the lower court, ordered the assets be moved to the children\u27s trust, and awarded them attorney\u27s fees
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
Settlor had created an inter vivas trust, retaining income for life, right to revoke, and control ov...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the district court that found Appellant had breach...
The Court determined that a no-contest clause in a trust does not foreclose a beneficiary’s interest...
The Court determined that (1) family courts have subject matter jurisdiction in divorce proceedings ...
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Trusts SS 338 (Am. Law Inst. 1959). It ...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
In an opinion authored by Justice Pickering, following both the NRS and California law, the Court af...
The Court determined that (1) the spousal exception bars recovery from the Nevada Real Estate Educat...
A second beneficiary is entitled to a property in a trust created by decedent and her former spouse,...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
The Court concluded that an individual’s personal assets are not subject to discovery or execution m...
NRS § 163.556 does not permit a court to disregard trustees\u27 objections and appoint half of a who...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
Settlor had created an inter vivas trust, retaining income for life, right to revoke, and control ov...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the district court that found Appellant had breach...
The Court determined that a no-contest clause in a trust does not foreclose a beneficiary’s interest...
The Court determined that (1) family courts have subject matter jurisdiction in divorce proceedings ...
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Trusts SS 338 (Am. Law Inst. 1959). It ...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
In an opinion authored by Justice Pickering, following both the NRS and California law, the Court af...
The Court determined that (1) the spousal exception bars recovery from the Nevada Real Estate Educat...
A second beneficiary is entitled to a property in a trust created by decedent and her former spouse,...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
The Court concluded that an individual’s personal assets are not subject to discovery or execution m...
NRS § 163.556 does not permit a court to disregard trustees\u27 objections and appoint half of a who...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
Settlor had created an inter vivas trust, retaining income for life, right to revoke, and control ov...