Add to ORKGThe Court determined that a no-contest clause in a trust does not foreclose a beneficiary’s interest if the beneficiary, acting as the trustee, breaches his or her fiduciary duty
A second beneficiary is entitled to a property in a trust created by decedent and her former spouse,...
The Court determined that (1) the spousal exception bars recovery from the Nevada Real Estate Educat...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court determined that a no-contest clause in a trust does not foreclose a beneficiary’s interest...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the district court that found Appellant had breach...
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Trusts SS 338 (Am. Law Inst. 1959). It ...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that (1) family courts have subject matter jurisdiction in divorce proceedings ...
NRS § 163.556 does not permit a court to disregard trustees\u27 objections and appoint half of a who...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
In an opinion authored by Justice Pickering, following both the NRS and California law, the Court af...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
A second beneficiary is entitled to a property in a trust created by decedent and her former spouse,...
The Court determined that (1) the spousal exception bars recovery from the Nevada Real Estate Educat...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court determined that a no-contest clause in a trust does not foreclose a beneficiary’s interest...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the district court that found Appellant had breach...
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Trusts SS 338 (Am. Law Inst. 1959). It ...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that (1) family courts have subject matter jurisdiction in divorce proceedings ...
NRS § 163.556 does not permit a court to disregard trustees\u27 objections and appoint half of a who...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
In an opinion authored by Justice Pickering, following both the NRS and California law, the Court af...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
A second beneficiary is entitled to a property in a trust created by decedent and her former spouse,...
The Court determined that (1) the spousal exception bars recovery from the Nevada Real Estate Educat...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...