AbstractIn a topos, the characteristic arrow of a diagonal is called “internal equality”. It is natural to wonder if axiomatizing internal equality, through a “diagonal classifier”, instead of the subobject classifier, would be enough in order to have a topos. We prove that the answer is no, but that it becomes yes, if we add a single axiom, asking for the existence of a “description operator”, which enables to “peek” the sole element of any singleton. In a linguistic conclusion, we explain how this illuminates the role of sentences like “the unique x in A, such that …”, in ordinary mathematical language
summary:The two diffeomorphism invariant algebras introduced in Grosser M., Far\-kas E., Kunziger ...
AbstractIn this paper we present several new characterizations of normal and Hermitian elements in r...
AbstractThe notion of arrow by Hughes is an axiomatization of the algebraic structure possessed by s...
AbstractWe prove Heyneman–Radford Theorem in the framework of monoidal categories
A categorical version of the famous theorem of Stone and Weierstrass is formulated and studied in de...
In the first part of this article we formalize the concepts of terminal and initial object, categori...
We extend the known piecewise linear parametrization of the canonical basis of the plus part of an e...
In this article we present an axiomatic definition of sets with individuals and a definition of natu...
AbstractLet Di be a strongly double triangle subspace lattice on a Banach space Xi, where i=1,2. If ...
AbstractMost of the properties of the category of Lusternik–Schnirelmann come from the cube theorems...
Axiomatizing mathematical structures and theories is an objective of Mathematical Logic. Some axioma...
AbstractThe present second part of a three-part paper gives the detailed treatment of the new notion...
AbstractMirsky proved that, for the existence of a complex matrix with given eigenvalues and diagona...
AbstractWe prove that every finitary polynomial endofunctor of a category C has a fin...
For A ∈ L(X, Y ), B ∈ L(Z , T ) we consider the operator h : L(Y, Z ) →L(X, T ), h(U ) = BU A.We pro...
summary:The two diffeomorphism invariant algebras introduced in Grosser M., Far\-kas E., Kunziger ...
AbstractIn this paper we present several new characterizations of normal and Hermitian elements in r...
AbstractThe notion of arrow by Hughes is an axiomatization of the algebraic structure possessed by s...
AbstractWe prove Heyneman–Radford Theorem in the framework of monoidal categories
A categorical version of the famous theorem of Stone and Weierstrass is formulated and studied in de...
In the first part of this article we formalize the concepts of terminal and initial object, categori...
We extend the known piecewise linear parametrization of the canonical basis of the plus part of an e...
In this article we present an axiomatic definition of sets with individuals and a definition of natu...
AbstractLet Di be a strongly double triangle subspace lattice on a Banach space Xi, where i=1,2. If ...
AbstractMost of the properties of the category of Lusternik–Schnirelmann come from the cube theorems...
Axiomatizing mathematical structures and theories is an objective of Mathematical Logic. Some axioma...
AbstractThe present second part of a three-part paper gives the detailed treatment of the new notion...
AbstractMirsky proved that, for the existence of a complex matrix with given eigenvalues and diagona...
AbstractWe prove that every finitary polynomial endofunctor of a category C has a fin...
For A ∈ L(X, Y ), B ∈ L(Z , T ) we consider the operator h : L(Y, Z ) →L(X, T ), h(U ) = BU A.We pro...
summary:The two diffeomorphism invariant algebras introduced in Grosser M., Far\-kas E., Kunziger ...
AbstractIn this paper we present several new characterizations of normal and Hermitian elements in r...
AbstractThe notion of arrow by Hughes is an axiomatization of the algebraic structure possessed by s...