AbstractThis paper gives an account of results which answer some questions from Harel (1978, 1979), Meyer and Winklmann (1980) and Tiuryn (1982). In particular it is shown that the deterministic regular logic is strictly weaker than the regular logic, the context-free logic strictly weaker than the finitely generated recursive logic, the recursive logic strictly weaker than the weak ω-order logic, and the recursive logic strictly stronger than the finitely generated recursive logic. Some well-known and new open problems are stated
AbstractFor a dynamic logic L we study dynamic logics Ln for which programs allowed in formulas cann...
AbstractThe borderline between decidable and undecidable propositional dynamic Logic (PDL) is sought...
AbstractWe consider a restricted propositional dynamic logic, Strict Deterministic Propositional Dyn...
AbstractThis paper gives an account of results which answer some questions from Harel (1978, 1979), ...
In (A. P. Stolboushkin and M.A. Taitslin, Inform. Contr. 57 (1983), 48–55) Taitslin introduced a str...
We make explicit a connection between the “unwind property” and first-order logics of programs. Usin...
There is a language L and structures A1 and A2 for L such that, for each closed formula F of determi...
In this paper we study the expressive power of nondeterminism in dynamic logic. In particular, we sh...
AbstractSeveral different first-order formal logics of programs—Algorithmic Logic, Dynamic Logic, an...
AbstractA simplified proof of the result stating that deterministic dynamic logic is strictly weaker...
AbstractWe study the expressive power of various versions of Dynamic Logic and compare them with eac...
AbstractWe show that Test-free Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL0) is less expressive than Propositio...
Abstract‘Looping’ of nondeterministic while-programs is shown to be expressible in Regular First Ord...
Non-regular program correctness properties play an important role in the specification of unbounded ...
It is proved that no logic of programs with unbounded memory is reducible to a bounded memory progra...
AbstractFor a dynamic logic L we study dynamic logics Ln for which programs allowed in formulas cann...
AbstractThe borderline between decidable and undecidable propositional dynamic Logic (PDL) is sought...
AbstractWe consider a restricted propositional dynamic logic, Strict Deterministic Propositional Dyn...
AbstractThis paper gives an account of results which answer some questions from Harel (1978, 1979), ...
In (A. P. Stolboushkin and M.A. Taitslin, Inform. Contr. 57 (1983), 48–55) Taitslin introduced a str...
We make explicit a connection between the “unwind property” and first-order logics of programs. Usin...
There is a language L and structures A1 and A2 for L such that, for each closed formula F of determi...
In this paper we study the expressive power of nondeterminism in dynamic logic. In particular, we sh...
AbstractSeveral different first-order formal logics of programs—Algorithmic Logic, Dynamic Logic, an...
AbstractA simplified proof of the result stating that deterministic dynamic logic is strictly weaker...
AbstractWe study the expressive power of various versions of Dynamic Logic and compare them with eac...
AbstractWe show that Test-free Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL0) is less expressive than Propositio...
Abstract‘Looping’ of nondeterministic while-programs is shown to be expressible in Regular First Ord...
Non-regular program correctness properties play an important role in the specification of unbounded ...
It is proved that no logic of programs with unbounded memory is reducible to a bounded memory progra...
AbstractFor a dynamic logic L we study dynamic logics Ln for which programs allowed in formulas cann...
AbstractThe borderline between decidable and undecidable propositional dynamic Logic (PDL) is sought...
AbstractWe consider a restricted propositional dynamic logic, Strict Deterministic Propositional Dyn...