AbstractThis paper gives an account of results which answer some questions from Harel (1978, 1979), Meyer and Winklmann (1980) and Tiuryn (1982). In particular it is shown that the deterministic regular logic is strictly weaker than the regular logic, the context-free logic strictly weaker than the finitely generated recursive logic, the recursive logic strictly weaker than the weak ω-order logic, and the recursive logic strictly stronger than the finitely generated recursive logic. Some well-known and new open problems are stated
Non-regular program correctness properties play an important role in the specification of unbounded ...
Several versions of quantified dynamic logic are shown to be equivalent in expressive power to “stat...
International audienceWe study the expressive power of successor-invariant first-order logic, which ...
AbstractThis paper gives an account of results which answer some questions from Harel (1978, 1979), ...
In this paper we study the expressive power of nondeterminism in dynamic logic. In particular, we sh...
There is a language L and structures A1 and A2 for L such that, for each closed formula F of determi...
AbstractA simplified proof of the result stating that deterministic dynamic logic is strictly weaker...
AbstractWe study the expressive power of various versions of Dynamic Logic and compare them with eac...
In (A. P. Stolboushkin and M.A. Taitslin, Inform. Contr. 57 (1983), 48–55) Taitslin introduced a str...
We make explicit a connection between the “unwind property” and first-order logics of programs. Usin...
AbstractFor a dynamic logic L we study dynamic logics Ln for which programs allowed in formulas cann...
AbstractSeveral different first-order formal logics of programs—Algorithmic Logic, Dynamic Logic, an...
Abstract This paper investigates the question “when is a logic more expressive than another?” In ord...
It is shown that any non-first-order fragment of quantificational dynamic logic with certain natural...
AbstractWe show that Test-free Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL0) is less expressive than Propositio...
Non-regular program correctness properties play an important role in the specification of unbounded ...
Several versions of quantified dynamic logic are shown to be equivalent in expressive power to “stat...
International audienceWe study the expressive power of successor-invariant first-order logic, which ...
AbstractThis paper gives an account of results which answer some questions from Harel (1978, 1979), ...
In this paper we study the expressive power of nondeterminism in dynamic logic. In particular, we sh...
There is a language L and structures A1 and A2 for L such that, for each closed formula F of determi...
AbstractA simplified proof of the result stating that deterministic dynamic logic is strictly weaker...
AbstractWe study the expressive power of various versions of Dynamic Logic and compare them with eac...
In (A. P. Stolboushkin and M.A. Taitslin, Inform. Contr. 57 (1983), 48–55) Taitslin introduced a str...
We make explicit a connection between the “unwind property” and first-order logics of programs. Usin...
AbstractFor a dynamic logic L we study dynamic logics Ln for which programs allowed in formulas cann...
AbstractSeveral different first-order formal logics of programs—Algorithmic Logic, Dynamic Logic, an...
Abstract This paper investigates the question “when is a logic more expressive than another?” In ord...
It is shown that any non-first-order fragment of quantificational dynamic logic with certain natural...
AbstractWe show that Test-free Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL0) is less expressive than Propositio...
Non-regular program correctness properties play an important role in the specification of unbounded ...
Several versions of quantified dynamic logic are shown to be equivalent in expressive power to “stat...
International audienceWe study the expressive power of successor-invariant first-order logic, which ...