Without a convincing account of inequality's causes, egalitarians will continue to cede ground to the right, whose language of prudence and responsibility justifies further tightening of the welfare system. Advancing the cause of equality requires engaging with the right on the terrain of ideas and values, argues Emily McTernan
In this paper, I explore how the luck egalitarian focus on choice and responsibility make it so that...
The leading discourse about luck egalitarianism has been informed by the distinction between equali...
A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair –...
Luck egalitarianism originated in an attempt to respond to the conservative objection that egalitari...
One of the main debates in left political philosophy is that between social and luck egalitarians. S...
Egalitarians claim that inequality in society is only justified to the extent that it results from c...
Luck egalitarianism - the theory that makes individual responsibility central to distributive justic...
In this introduction, we underline the theoretical connection between responsibility, luck, and equa...
Luck egalitarians argue that distributive justice should be understood in terms of our capacity to b...
Luck egalitarianism is a broad theory of justice that emphasises the importance of responsibility (t...
This thesis argues that a particular version of equal opportunity for welfare is the best way of mee...
Lippert-Rasmussen has proposed a new version of luck egalitarianism: equality of concern. In this ar...
Contemporary egalitarianism has been defined by its attempt to render the distribution o...
In the last four decades, luck egalitarianism has emerged as a hotly debated theory of distributive ...
The family of theories dubbed ‘luck egalitarianism’ represent an attempt to infuse egalitarian think...
In this paper, I explore how the luck egalitarian focus on choice and responsibility make it so that...
The leading discourse about luck egalitarianism has been informed by the distinction between equali...
A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair –...
Luck egalitarianism originated in an attempt to respond to the conservative objection that egalitari...
One of the main debates in left political philosophy is that between social and luck egalitarians. S...
Egalitarians claim that inequality in society is only justified to the extent that it results from c...
Luck egalitarianism - the theory that makes individual responsibility central to distributive justic...
In this introduction, we underline the theoretical connection between responsibility, luck, and equa...
Luck egalitarians argue that distributive justice should be understood in terms of our capacity to b...
Luck egalitarianism is a broad theory of justice that emphasises the importance of responsibility (t...
This thesis argues that a particular version of equal opportunity for welfare is the best way of mee...
Lippert-Rasmussen has proposed a new version of luck egalitarianism: equality of concern. In this ar...
Contemporary egalitarianism has been defined by its attempt to render the distribution o...
In the last four decades, luck egalitarianism has emerged as a hotly debated theory of distributive ...
The family of theories dubbed ‘luck egalitarianism’ represent an attempt to infuse egalitarian think...
In this paper, I explore how the luck egalitarian focus on choice and responsibility make it so that...
The leading discourse about luck egalitarianism has been informed by the distinction between equali...
A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair –...
DOI
Add to ORKG