No-one wants to have their paper rejected by a top journal, but is there a silver lining to an initial disappointment? Vincent Calcagno finds that papers that are resubmitted to a second or third choice journal enjoy a ‘benefit of rejection’ and are more likely to receive a higher number of citations when published
Mathematical models of the scientific citation process predict a strong first-mover effect under whi...
Previous studies about the academic publishing process consider the publication delay as starting fr...
A publishing initiative launched earlier this year by the journal Cortex re-establishes the crucial ...
This paper investigates the fate of manuscripts that were rejected from JASSS-The Journal of Artific...
Seriously—PLEASE! Journals want us to revise and resubmit papers that are rejected because it benefi...
This paper investigates the fate of manuscripts that were rejected from JASSS-The Journal of Artific...
Under a set of reasonable assumptions, it is shown that all manuscripts submitted to any journal wil...
Popular scientific journals receive thousands more manuscripts than they can ever possibly publish –...
Academic publishers purport to be arbiters of knowledge, aiming to publish studied that advance the ...
This paper investigates the fate of manuscripts that were rejected from JASSS-The Journal of Artific...
Journal ranking schemes may seem useful, but Björn Brembs discusses how the Thompson Reuters Impact ...
This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.We...
Articles in high-impact journals are, on average, more frequently cited. But are they cited more oft...
Academic publishers purport to be arbiters of knowledge, aiming to publish studies that advance the ...
Progress in ecological research is basically driven by the publication of studies in peer reviewed j...
Mathematical models of the scientific citation process predict a strong first-mover effect under whi...
Previous studies about the academic publishing process consider the publication delay as starting fr...
A publishing initiative launched earlier this year by the journal Cortex re-establishes the crucial ...
This paper investigates the fate of manuscripts that were rejected from JASSS-The Journal of Artific...
Seriously—PLEASE! Journals want us to revise and resubmit papers that are rejected because it benefi...
This paper investigates the fate of manuscripts that were rejected from JASSS-The Journal of Artific...
Under a set of reasonable assumptions, it is shown that all manuscripts submitted to any journal wil...
Popular scientific journals receive thousands more manuscripts than they can ever possibly publish –...
Academic publishers purport to be arbiters of knowledge, aiming to publish studied that advance the ...
This paper investigates the fate of manuscripts that were rejected from JASSS-The Journal of Artific...
Journal ranking schemes may seem useful, but Björn Brembs discusses how the Thompson Reuters Impact ...
This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.We...
Articles in high-impact journals are, on average, more frequently cited. But are they cited more oft...
Academic publishers purport to be arbiters of knowledge, aiming to publish studies that advance the ...
Progress in ecological research is basically driven by the publication of studies in peer reviewed j...
Mathematical models of the scientific citation process predict a strong first-mover effect under whi...
Previous studies about the academic publishing process consider the publication delay as starting fr...
A publishing initiative launched earlier this year by the journal Cortex re-establishes the crucial ...