Add to ORKGRelative to commentators at Political Science and Economics meetings, the discussants at law conferences are generally quite kind, genteel even. They almost always say, This is a really wonderful set of papers - even if the papers are not so wonderful - or that they really learned a lot from the papers - even if they didn\u27t. Happily, with regard to the three papers the organizers asked me to discuss,\u27 I need not stretch the truth for purposes of collegiality. I really do think they are a wonderful set of papers and really did learn a lo
It is a privilege to appear as lecturer on this platform honoring a noted American law professor, Ed...
Recent Supreme Court cases reveal a fascinating conversation across time between the Court and the F...
For more years than I care to contemplate—nigh onto thirty—I have been teaching and writing about co...
Relative to commentators at Political Science and Economics meetings, the discussants at law confere...
One theme running through the many excellent contributions to this symposium involves the myriad inf...
In this paper, which was prepared to help set the stage at an interdisciplinary conference held at t...
One theme running through the many excellent contributions to this symposium involves the myriad inf...
The purpose of this conference is a dialogue between scholars and judges about judging. Because judg...
Unlike most symposia, this one is not restricted to a single topic. The common theme of this endeavo...
What kinds of empirical questions about themselves and their colleagues on the bench are judges inte...
Empirical scholarship on judges, judging, and judicial institutions, a staple in political science, ...
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming...
This article focuses, in the first instance, on the writing of Harry T. Edwards7, Emeritus Circuit J...
I am pleased to introduce this Judicial Symposium issue of the Akron Law Review. Having twice been e...
Aside from its value within programs of legal education, does legal scholarship serve important func...
It is a privilege to appear as lecturer on this platform honoring a noted American law professor, Ed...
Recent Supreme Court cases reveal a fascinating conversation across time between the Court and the F...
For more years than I care to contemplate—nigh onto thirty—I have been teaching and writing about co...
Relative to commentators at Political Science and Economics meetings, the discussants at law confere...
One theme running through the many excellent contributions to this symposium involves the myriad inf...
In this paper, which was prepared to help set the stage at an interdisciplinary conference held at t...
One theme running through the many excellent contributions to this symposium involves the myriad inf...
The purpose of this conference is a dialogue between scholars and judges about judging. Because judg...
Unlike most symposia, this one is not restricted to a single topic. The common theme of this endeavo...
What kinds of empirical questions about themselves and their colleagues on the bench are judges inte...
Empirical scholarship on judges, judging, and judicial institutions, a staple in political science, ...
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming...
This article focuses, in the first instance, on the writing of Harry T. Edwards7, Emeritus Circuit J...
I am pleased to introduce this Judicial Symposium issue of the Akron Law Review. Having twice been e...
Aside from its value within programs of legal education, does legal scholarship serve important func...
It is a privilege to appear as lecturer on this platform honoring a noted American law professor, Ed...
Recent Supreme Court cases reveal a fascinating conversation across time between the Court and the F...
For more years than I care to contemplate—nigh onto thirty—I have been teaching and writing about co...