What kinds of empirical questions about themselves and their colleagues on the bench are judges interested in asking? This was the topic of a recent conference at the Duke Law School. Our Essay reflects on the ways in which the judges at this conference and at a prior one talked about the empirical study of their community. To put it mildly, most of the judges were not fans of the empirical research. Our interest in this Essay is not, however, in responding to the judicial criticisms. Rather it is in drawing insights about how judges view themselves and their profession from how they discussed the research at the conference
Judges are considered to always know the law (ius curia novit), so the decision must contain adequat...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
In this article, I introduce and examine the novel concept of bench representation. Jurists and scho...
What kinds of empirical questions about themselves and their colleagues on the bench are judges inte...
Empirical scholarship on judges, judging, and judicial institutions, a staple in political science, ...
Knowing how a judge will react to certain trial techniques in a trial can greatly enhance an attorne...
This essay discredits current empirical models that are designed to “judge” or rank appellate judges...
In the inaugural essay of this series, Judge Coffin described this unique effort of the editors of t...
Scholars who use empirical methods to study the behavior of judges long have labored in relative obs...
Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies re...
Studying the legal profession poses several challenges. The evolution of law has moved lawyers away ...
Despite the abundance of studies exposing heuristic and biased thinking in judicial decision-making,...
The article takes up the question of how best to put the increasing amount of interdisciplinary scho...
Research into judicial attitudes and perceptions of sentencing is rare, and there are difficulties w...
This dissertation incorporates the study of heuristics into the field of judicial behavior. Heuristi...
Judges are considered to always know the law (ius curia novit), so the decision must contain adequat...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
In this article, I introduce and examine the novel concept of bench representation. Jurists and scho...
What kinds of empirical questions about themselves and their colleagues on the bench are judges inte...
Empirical scholarship on judges, judging, and judicial institutions, a staple in political science, ...
Knowing how a judge will react to certain trial techniques in a trial can greatly enhance an attorne...
This essay discredits current empirical models that are designed to “judge” or rank appellate judges...
In the inaugural essay of this series, Judge Coffin described this unique effort of the editors of t...
Scholars who use empirical methods to study the behavior of judges long have labored in relative obs...
Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies re...
Studying the legal profession poses several challenges. The evolution of law has moved lawyers away ...
Despite the abundance of studies exposing heuristic and biased thinking in judicial decision-making,...
The article takes up the question of how best to put the increasing amount of interdisciplinary scho...
Research into judicial attitudes and perceptions of sentencing is rare, and there are difficulties w...
This dissertation incorporates the study of heuristics into the field of judicial behavior. Heuristi...
Judges are considered to always know the law (ius curia novit), so the decision must contain adequat...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
In this article, I introduce and examine the novel concept of bench representation. Jurists and scho...