Add to ORKGThe starting point of human rights law is the right of the individual, including the right not to be arbitrarily killed. The international law of armed conflict, which is very much older in its origins than human rights law, starts from totally different premises. The soldier has the right to kill another soldie
Perhaps more than any other body of international law, jus in bello-the law of armed conflict-faces ...
“Humanity’s law”—the merger of human rights law and the laws of war—is more ambivalent than first ap...
The unconventional nature of the September 11 terrorist attacks represent to some observers a need t...
The starting point of human rights law is the right of the individual, including the right not to be...
It is essential to correctly classify situations in the world as ones of war or peace: human lives d...
Both international and domestic law take as a basic premise the notion that it is possible, importan...
Do the laws of war govern the September 11 attacks? Did the attacks constitute war crimes ? These q...
International Humanitarian Laws of Armed Conflict effectively prohibit the use of terror-violence as...
The war on terror is a peculiar type of conflict: at times it involves military operations, subject ...
In the first confusing days after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, President Ge...
The recent demise of arch-terrorist Osama bin Laden at the hands of United States (US) Navy Seals ha...
Instead, I argue that international human rights law precludes the existence of any legal black hol...
The United States has justified targeted operations against suspected terrorists as a legitimate too...
War is with us more than ever. This is true despite the efforts of the United Nations Charter to ban...
War rarely is good for human rights. The decision of the United States to launch a “global war on te...
Perhaps more than any other body of international law, jus in bello-the law of armed conflict-faces ...
“Humanity’s law”—the merger of human rights law and the laws of war—is more ambivalent than first ap...
The unconventional nature of the September 11 terrorist attacks represent to some observers a need t...
The starting point of human rights law is the right of the individual, including the right not to be...
It is essential to correctly classify situations in the world as ones of war or peace: human lives d...
Both international and domestic law take as a basic premise the notion that it is possible, importan...
Do the laws of war govern the September 11 attacks? Did the attacks constitute war crimes ? These q...
International Humanitarian Laws of Armed Conflict effectively prohibit the use of terror-violence as...
The war on terror is a peculiar type of conflict: at times it involves military operations, subject ...
In the first confusing days after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, President Ge...
The recent demise of arch-terrorist Osama bin Laden at the hands of United States (US) Navy Seals ha...
Instead, I argue that international human rights law precludes the existence of any legal black hol...
The United States has justified targeted operations against suspected terrorists as a legitimate too...
War is with us more than ever. This is true despite the efforts of the United Nations Charter to ban...
War rarely is good for human rights. The decision of the United States to launch a “global war on te...
Perhaps more than any other body of international law, jus in bello-the law of armed conflict-faces ...
“Humanity’s law”—the merger of human rights law and the laws of war—is more ambivalent than first ap...
The unconventional nature of the September 11 terrorist attacks represent to some observers a need t...