Add to ORKGAbstract The identification of plausible epistemic approaches in science as well as the social problem definitions with which scientists implicitly work is essential for the quality of a deliberative public policy. While responding to the Nanofutures project, I will reflect on the essential elements of such a policy
How do we mean ‘democratic’ and ‘dialogic’ when referring to something supposedly universal such as ...
Scientific knowledge has not stabilized in the current, early, phase of research and development of ...
In this paper I engage with debates on technoscientific governance, narrative, and emergent public a...
ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the challenges of negotiating plausibility in a national scenarios...
<p>Ariticle on identify plausibility claims in the context of scientific and public controversies an...
This publication consists of a series of research articles on the nature of public debate on nanosci...
Despite the amount of public investment in nanotechnology ventures in the developed world, research ...
In this article we argue that nanotechnology represents an extraordinary opportunity to build in a r...
This compact open access reference delves beyond popular concepts of educated consumers and an infor...
In this paper I engage with debates on technoscientific governance, narrative, and emergent public a...
<p>A volume with EU funded projects studying the public debate/public policies on nanotechnologies</...
This paper is intended to further the discussion on the use and dissemination of 'expert knowledge',...
In the first phase of the research project Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow's Society (www.nanosoc.be),...
When one wants to use citizen input to inform policy, what should the standards of informedness on t...
This contribution is adapted from the Keynote Address given by Dr Stephen Goldson in Brisbane in Nov...
How do we mean ‘democratic’ and ‘dialogic’ when referring to something supposedly universal such as ...
Scientific knowledge has not stabilized in the current, early, phase of research and development of ...
In this paper I engage with debates on technoscientific governance, narrative, and emergent public a...
ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the challenges of negotiating plausibility in a national scenarios...
<p>Ariticle on identify plausibility claims in the context of scientific and public controversies an...
This publication consists of a series of research articles on the nature of public debate on nanosci...
Despite the amount of public investment in nanotechnology ventures in the developed world, research ...
In this article we argue that nanotechnology represents an extraordinary opportunity to build in a r...
This compact open access reference delves beyond popular concepts of educated consumers and an infor...
In this paper I engage with debates on technoscientific governance, narrative, and emergent public a...
<p>A volume with EU funded projects studying the public debate/public policies on nanotechnologies</...
This paper is intended to further the discussion on the use and dissemination of 'expert knowledge',...
In the first phase of the research project Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow's Society (www.nanosoc.be),...
When one wants to use citizen input to inform policy, what should the standards of informedness on t...
This contribution is adapted from the Keynote Address given by Dr Stephen Goldson in Brisbane in Nov...
How do we mean ‘democratic’ and ‘dialogic’ when referring to something supposedly universal such as ...
Scientific knowledge has not stabilized in the current, early, phase of research and development of ...
In this paper I engage with debates on technoscientific governance, narrative, and emergent public a...