Publication date
April 2014
DOIAbstract
<p>Ariticle on identify plausibility claims in the context of scientific and public controversies and their relation to decision making/policy</p
<p>Ariticle on identify plausibility claims in the context of scientific and public controversies and their relation to decision making/policy</p
Considerable interest has emerged recently within U.S. policy scholarship toward deliberative democr...
Around the world, there is a growing interest among policy scholars and practitioners in the role of...
This thesis aims to consider the role played by science in policy making. Firstly, two decision mode...
Abstract The identification of plausible epistemic approaches in science as well as the social probl...
Public scientific controversies are often the enemy of deliberation, because debating and winning ta...
Scientists often worry that their evidence is not used properly in the policy-making process. Their ...
Various theoretical models of public policy analysis are used to treat situations of decision-making...
This paper is intended to further the discussion on the use and dissemination of 'expert knowledge',...
As public policy issues increasingly have a technical aspect to them an interactive relationship has...
This dissertation offers a normative account of policy analysis based on the idea that policy analys...
Deliberative polls are an instrument whose aim is to provide a more accurate, scientific representat...
Our work aims to make the arguments underlying a scientific controversy more clear and more understa...
Policy decisions in many areas involving science, including the environment and public health, are b...
Rawlsian idea of public reason refers to the boundaries on political justification of coercive laws ...
We propose the use of discussion structures as tools for analyzing policy debates in a way that enab...
Considerable interest has emerged recently within U.S. policy scholarship toward deliberative democr...
Around the world, there is a growing interest among policy scholars and practitioners in the role of...
This thesis aims to consider the role played by science in policy making. Firstly, two decision mode...
Abstract The identification of plausible epistemic approaches in science as well as the social probl...
Public scientific controversies are often the enemy of deliberation, because debating and winning ta...
Scientists often worry that their evidence is not used properly in the policy-making process. Their ...
Various theoretical models of public policy analysis are used to treat situations of decision-making...
This paper is intended to further the discussion on the use and dissemination of 'expert knowledge',...
As public policy issues increasingly have a technical aspect to them an interactive relationship has...
This dissertation offers a normative account of policy analysis based on the idea that policy analys...
Deliberative polls are an instrument whose aim is to provide a more accurate, scientific representat...
Our work aims to make the arguments underlying a scientific controversy more clear and more understa...
Policy decisions in many areas involving science, including the environment and public health, are b...
Rawlsian idea of public reason refers to the boundaries on political justification of coercive laws ...
We propose the use of discussion structures as tools for analyzing policy debates in a way that enab...
Considerable interest has emerged recently within U.S. policy scholarship toward deliberative democr...
Around the world, there is a growing interest among policy scholars and practitioners in the role of...
This thesis aims to consider the role played by science in policy making. Firstly, two decision mode...
Add to ORKG