We explore the impact of investment-specific technology (IST) shocks on the cross section of stock returns. Using a structural model, we show that IST shocks have a differential effect on the value of assets in place and the value of growth opportunities. This differential sensitivity to IST shocks has two main implications. First, firm risk premia depend on the contribution of growth opportunities to firm value. Second, firms with similar levels of growth opportunities comove with each other, giving rise to the value factor in stock returns and the failure of the conditional CAPM. Our empirical tests confirm the model's predictions
Investment-specific technology (IST) shocks are often interpreted as multi-factor productivity (MFP)...
We test whether innovations in aggregate risk, interpolated from a vector autoregressive system that...
We test whether innovations in aggregate risk, interpolated from a vector autoregressive system that...
We analyze comovement in stock returns among firms with similar past investment rates or profitabili...
Average return differences among firms sorted on valuation ratios, past investment, profitability, m...
I show that investment-specific technological change is a source of systematic risk. Positive shocks...
I show that a firm's capital intensity determines the asset pricing implications of investment-speci...
ABSTRACT We provide a theoretical model linking firm characteristics and expected returns. The key i...
In this paper we assess the role of capital-embodied technology shocks in explaining prop-erties of ...
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2007.Includes bi...
In this paper we study asset pricing in the presence of technological growth. We present a model, wh...
I show that a firm’s capital intensity affects the asset pricing implications of investment-specific...
© 2016 Dr. Mengyu ZhouI study the cross-sectional return implications of technology shocks through t...
Starr Center and the NSF is greatly appreciated. We develop a model in which innovations in an econo...
We test whether innovations in aggregate risk, interpolated from a vector autoregressive system that...
Investment-specific technology (IST) shocks are often interpreted as multi-factor productivity (MFP)...
We test whether innovations in aggregate risk, interpolated from a vector autoregressive system that...
We test whether innovations in aggregate risk, interpolated from a vector autoregressive system that...
We analyze comovement in stock returns among firms with similar past investment rates or profitabili...
Average return differences among firms sorted on valuation ratios, past investment, profitability, m...
I show that investment-specific technological change is a source of systematic risk. Positive shocks...
I show that a firm's capital intensity determines the asset pricing implications of investment-speci...
ABSTRACT We provide a theoretical model linking firm characteristics and expected returns. The key i...
In this paper we assess the role of capital-embodied technology shocks in explaining prop-erties of ...
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2007.Includes bi...
In this paper we study asset pricing in the presence of technological growth. We present a model, wh...
I show that a firm’s capital intensity affects the asset pricing implications of investment-specific...
© 2016 Dr. Mengyu ZhouI study the cross-sectional return implications of technology shocks through t...
Starr Center and the NSF is greatly appreciated. We develop a model in which innovations in an econo...
We test whether innovations in aggregate risk, interpolated from a vector autoregressive system that...
Investment-specific technology (IST) shocks are often interpreted as multi-factor productivity (MFP)...
We test whether innovations in aggregate risk, interpolated from a vector autoregressive system that...
We test whether innovations in aggregate risk, interpolated from a vector autoregressive system that...