This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationships sensical and legitimate. Interpretive analyses of 110 interviews revealed four main types of voluntary kin: (i) substitute family, (ii) supplemental family, (iii) convenience family, and (iv) extended family. These types were rendered sensical and legitimated by drawing on the discourse of the traditional family. Except for the extended family, three of four voluntary kin family types were justified by an attributed deficit in the blood and legal family. Because voluntary kin relationships are not based on the traditional criteria of association by blood or law, members experience them as potentially challenging, requiring discursive work to render them s...
Increases in parental cohabitation, separation or divorce, and re‐partnering or remarriage have gene...
Family is special. People avoid sexual contact with close relatives, but at the same time are highly...
This article argues that kinship terminologies are best studied in their full linguistic context; th...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationships sensical and ...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationships sensical and ...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationshi...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationshi...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationshi...
Although scholars have constructed typologies of voluntary (fictive) kin, few have considered challe...
Although scholars have constructed typologies of voluntary (fictive) kin, few have considered challe...
Current research on fictive kin primarily focuses on the assignment of the fictive kin relationship,...
Current research on fictive kin primarily focuses on the assignment of the fictive kin relationship,...
textabstractKin relationships are traditionally defined as ties based on blood and marriage. They in...
This Special Issue brings together contributions by scholars working on various family configuration...
We think about personal relationships in two distinct ways. The first focuses on relationships betwe...
Increases in parental cohabitation, separation or divorce, and re‐partnering or remarriage have gene...
Family is special. People avoid sexual contact with close relatives, but at the same time are highly...
This article argues that kinship terminologies are best studied in their full linguistic context; th...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationships sensical and ...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationships sensical and ...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationshi...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationshi...
This study explored how participants discursively rendered voluntary kin relationshi...
Although scholars have constructed typologies of voluntary (fictive) kin, few have considered challe...
Although scholars have constructed typologies of voluntary (fictive) kin, few have considered challe...
Current research on fictive kin primarily focuses on the assignment of the fictive kin relationship,...
Current research on fictive kin primarily focuses on the assignment of the fictive kin relationship,...
textabstractKin relationships are traditionally defined as ties based on blood and marriage. They in...
This Special Issue brings together contributions by scholars working on various family configuration...
We think about personal relationships in two distinct ways. The first focuses on relationships betwe...
Increases in parental cohabitation, separation or divorce, and re‐partnering or remarriage have gene...
Family is special. People avoid sexual contact with close relatives, but at the same time are highly...
This article argues that kinship terminologies are best studied in their full linguistic context; th...