For decades, the US has used sanctions against countries and regimes where they seek to encourage change. But what determines whether or not the US imposes sanctions in the first place? In new research that examines more than 50 years of sanctions, Timothy M. Peterson finds that sanctions are more likely to be imposed against countries with poor allies that will not be able to step in with economic assistance. As the target country’s allies become wealthier, it is less likely that sanctions will be put in place
When economic sanctions are directed against a target state by a sender state, the sender obviously ...
Economic sanctions are a nuanced form of statecraft that have grown increasingly popular over the la...
When sender states consider the imposition of sanctions, they also take into account the consequence...
There is growing policy consensus in Washington and other Western capitals that economic sanctions a...
This paper seeks to explain not only the reasons and motivations behind why countries choose to use ...
While economic sanctions are widely believed to be ineffective policy instruments, their use has inc...
Throughout history, military and economic powers have used economic sanctions, blockades and boycott...
Economic sanctions have a long tradition of use in American foreign policy. There are many benefits ...
Are economic sanctions effective instruments of American foreign policy? The consensus view among sc...
Do economic sanctions against target countries work as sender countries intend? If so, what factors ...
Although much research has examined how third parties might affect the success of economic sanctions...
Economic sanctions have come under scrutiny in recent political scholarship. Sanction regimes are an...
Economic sanctions are always on the stage of international trade. Countries use them often in inter...
This article analyses economic sanctions starting from the perspective of a target that has to alloc...
A prevalent view among both scholars and policymakers is that economic sanctions stigmatize and isol...
When economic sanctions are directed against a target state by a sender state, the sender obviously ...
Economic sanctions are a nuanced form of statecraft that have grown increasingly popular over the la...
When sender states consider the imposition of sanctions, they also take into account the consequence...
There is growing policy consensus in Washington and other Western capitals that economic sanctions a...
This paper seeks to explain not only the reasons and motivations behind why countries choose to use ...
While economic sanctions are widely believed to be ineffective policy instruments, their use has inc...
Throughout history, military and economic powers have used economic sanctions, blockades and boycott...
Economic sanctions have a long tradition of use in American foreign policy. There are many benefits ...
Are economic sanctions effective instruments of American foreign policy? The consensus view among sc...
Do economic sanctions against target countries work as sender countries intend? If so, what factors ...
Although much research has examined how third parties might affect the success of economic sanctions...
Economic sanctions have come under scrutiny in recent political scholarship. Sanction regimes are an...
Economic sanctions are always on the stage of international trade. Countries use them often in inter...
This article analyses economic sanctions starting from the perspective of a target that has to alloc...
A prevalent view among both scholars and policymakers is that economic sanctions stigmatize and isol...
When economic sanctions are directed against a target state by a sender state, the sender obviously ...
Economic sanctions are a nuanced form of statecraft that have grown increasingly popular over the la...
When sender states consider the imposition of sanctions, they also take into account the consequence...