On June 11, 2014, in United States v. Stanley, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that the warrantless use of a tracking device to detect the location of a wireless signal was not a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The court reasoned that because the defendant was using his neighbor’s open wireless network, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The court’s reasoning was based on a belief that the use of an open wireless network, which is not password protected, is “likely illegal.” This comment argues that the Third Circuit erred in refusing to recognize the applicability of the test for “sense-enhancing devices” derived from the 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision Kyllo v. United States....
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from government intrusion into indi...
The Fourth Amendment protects people’s reasonable expectations of privacy when there is an actual, s...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
On June 11, 2014, in United States v. Stanley, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held ...
In a series of rulings by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon and the Ninth Circuit C...
The use of GPS surveillance technology for prolonged automated surveillance of American citizens is ...
In Pineda-Moreno, the Ninth Circuit held that prolonged police monitoring of a defendant’s precise l...
On May 17, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in United States v. Wurie held that...
In a controversial decision in 2010, the D.C. Circuit held that warrantless GPS tracking of an autom...
On August 5, 2015 the Fourth Circuit created a major ripple in Fourth Amendment law by ruling that w...
In the fall of 2010, a college student in Santa Clara, California, found a peculiar object on the un...
The warrantless acquisition of cell site location information (CSLI) by law enforcement implicates s...
On October 22, 2013, in United States v. Katzin, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit hel...
Federal and state law enforcement officials throughout the nation are currently using Global Positio...
While the Jones Court held unanimously that the Government’s use of a GPS device to track Antoine Jo...
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from government intrusion into indi...
The Fourth Amendment protects people’s reasonable expectations of privacy when there is an actual, s...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
On June 11, 2014, in United States v. Stanley, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held ...
In a series of rulings by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon and the Ninth Circuit C...
The use of GPS surveillance technology for prolonged automated surveillance of American citizens is ...
In Pineda-Moreno, the Ninth Circuit held that prolonged police monitoring of a defendant’s precise l...
On May 17, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in United States v. Wurie held that...
In a controversial decision in 2010, the D.C. Circuit held that warrantless GPS tracking of an autom...
On August 5, 2015 the Fourth Circuit created a major ripple in Fourth Amendment law by ruling that w...
In the fall of 2010, a college student in Santa Clara, California, found a peculiar object on the un...
The warrantless acquisition of cell site location information (CSLI) by law enforcement implicates s...
On October 22, 2013, in United States v. Katzin, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit hel...
Federal and state law enforcement officials throughout the nation are currently using Global Positio...
While the Jones Court held unanimously that the Government’s use of a GPS device to track Antoine Jo...
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from government intrusion into indi...
The Fourth Amendment protects people’s reasonable expectations of privacy when there is an actual, s...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...