The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court another opportunity to address how far Fourth Amendment protections against warrantless searches and seizures extend. Specifically, the issue before the Court was “whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell phone records revealing the locations and movement of a cell phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment.” On appeal before the Sixth Circuit, a divided three-judge panel held that “no search occurred under the Fourth Amendment because Carpenter had no reasonable expectation of privacy in cell phone location records held by his service provider.” The prosecution contended that cell-phone user...
The Fourth Amendment has long served as a barrier between the police and the people; ensuring the go...
The near ubiquity of smart phones in American society raises a multitude of issues as courts attempt...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether the government’s acquisition of...
Since the 1800s, the United States Supreme Court has struggled to define the limits of the Fourth Am...
In Carpenter v United States, the Supreme Court struggled to modernize twentieth-century search and ...
This past June, the Supreme Court decided the case Carpenter v. United States, which some may call o...
Is the location of a cell phone something that is private and protected from warrantless search by t...
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision, Carpenter v. United States, seemed to signal a shift in the Court...
On August 5, 2015 the Fourth Circuit created a major ripple in Fourth Amendment law by ruling that w...
Question: Does §2703(d) of the Stored Communications Act, which allows for law enforcement to acquir...
We finally have a federal ‘test case.’ In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court is poised to...
In 2014, in Riley v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the police must obtain a warrant b...
Courts are divided as to whether law enforcement can collect cell phone location information in real...
The Fourth Amendment has long served as a barrier between the police and the people; ensuring the go...
The near ubiquity of smart phones in American society raises a multitude of issues as courts attempt...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether the government’s acquisition of...
Since the 1800s, the United States Supreme Court has struggled to define the limits of the Fourth Am...
In Carpenter v United States, the Supreme Court struggled to modernize twentieth-century search and ...
This past June, the Supreme Court decided the case Carpenter v. United States, which some may call o...
Is the location of a cell phone something that is private and protected from warrantless search by t...
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision, Carpenter v. United States, seemed to signal a shift in the Court...
On August 5, 2015 the Fourth Circuit created a major ripple in Fourth Amendment law by ruling that w...
Question: Does §2703(d) of the Stored Communications Act, which allows for law enforcement to acquir...
We finally have a federal ‘test case.’ In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court is poised to...
In 2014, in Riley v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the police must obtain a warrant b...
Courts are divided as to whether law enforcement can collect cell phone location information in real...
The Fourth Amendment has long served as a barrier between the police and the people; ensuring the go...
The near ubiquity of smart phones in American society raises a multitude of issues as courts attempt...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...