Add to ORKGObtaining protection for business secrets in an agency proceeding is at best an imperfect art. The lack of any uniform rule and the confusion and delay which result from an ad hoc approach are highlighted by FCC v. Schreiber. The authors examine the current state of the law in light of the Schreiber decision and point up the present inequities. Their conclusion is that the situation can only be remedied by enactment of regulatory in camera procedures for all federal agencies. A model for such a regulation is appended to the article
Probably no other industry has so captured the interest of the American public or shown such phenome...
Employers often use broad language in employee confidentiality agreements to protect company informa...
Many federal agencies are running substantial legal risks by providing inadequate notice of signific...
Obtaining protection for business secrets in an agency proceeding is at best an imperfect art. The l...
The thesis of this article is that most of the problems of defining the scope of the privilege in a ...
In prescribing de novo judicial review of agencies’ decisions to withhold requested information from...
The First Amendment\u27s prohibition on prior restraints on speech is generally understood to be nea...
In CBS Corporation v. FCC, the D.C. Circuit struck down the Federal Communication Commission’s rules...
The use of telecommunications monitoring and recording devices in the workplace has generated consid...
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not reveal the text of regulations on which it...
During an adjudicatory hearing pursuant to a complaint filed by the Federal Trade Commission, counse...
In the attempt to bring complex patterns of social and economic interaction under effective public c...
In an industry in which information is the ultimate commodity, a new dilemma that confronts the medi...
Section 312(a)(7) of the Communications Act of 1934 requires that broadcast stations provide legally...
Sears, Roebuck and Company brought an action under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to compel d...
Probably no other industry has so captured the interest of the American public or shown such phenome...
Employers often use broad language in employee confidentiality agreements to protect company informa...
Many federal agencies are running substantial legal risks by providing inadequate notice of signific...
Obtaining protection for business secrets in an agency proceeding is at best an imperfect art. The l...
The thesis of this article is that most of the problems of defining the scope of the privilege in a ...
In prescribing de novo judicial review of agencies’ decisions to withhold requested information from...
The First Amendment\u27s prohibition on prior restraints on speech is generally understood to be nea...
In CBS Corporation v. FCC, the D.C. Circuit struck down the Federal Communication Commission’s rules...
The use of telecommunications monitoring and recording devices in the workplace has generated consid...
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not reveal the text of regulations on which it...
During an adjudicatory hearing pursuant to a complaint filed by the Federal Trade Commission, counse...
In the attempt to bring complex patterns of social and economic interaction under effective public c...
In an industry in which information is the ultimate commodity, a new dilemma that confronts the medi...
Section 312(a)(7) of the Communications Act of 1934 requires that broadcast stations provide legally...
Sears, Roebuck and Company brought an action under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to compel d...
Probably no other industry has so captured the interest of the American public or shown such phenome...
Employers often use broad language in employee confidentiality agreements to protect company informa...
Many federal agencies are running substantial legal risks by providing inadequate notice of signific...