The thesis of this article is that most of the problems of defining the scope of the privilege in a particular case are due to the paucity of information available to the trial judge who must rule on the issue. Furthermore, many of the formulas presently used are conceptually and functionally inadequate. Both of these problems can be solved by the use of in camera hearings, for such proceedings not only will provide the trial judge with sufficient information to make a fair and rational decision, but will also alleviate the present necessity to rule only on the basis of vague and indefinite standards
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
The government may invoke the deliberative process privilege to protect the communications of govern...
The allowance of cameras in the courtroom and televised trials have seemed to cause a debate within ...
The thesis of this article is that most of the problems of defining the scope of the privilege in a ...
The legal consequences of examination process of witnesses or experts in the Court are broadcast liv...
With in-person hearings limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, many courts pivoted to proceedings hel...
Over the past twenty years, most American courthouses have been wired with audio and video recording...
In several recent court cases, television viewers throughout the nation were able to see excerpts of...
The First Amendment is commonly interpreted to allow reporters a qualified privilege not to testify....
A peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and bro...
Obtaining protection for business secrets in an agency proceeding is at best an imperfect art. The l...
Parties litigant desire to obtain before trial all possible information relevant to the matter in is...
The scientific article presents the results of the study of the procedural features of the collectio...
This Note will argue that the attorney-client privilege is justified not only by the popular instrum...
The law of public interest immunity (PII), which permits the non-disclosure of material in evidence ...
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
The government may invoke the deliberative process privilege to protect the communications of govern...
The allowance of cameras in the courtroom and televised trials have seemed to cause a debate within ...
The thesis of this article is that most of the problems of defining the scope of the privilege in a ...
The legal consequences of examination process of witnesses or experts in the Court are broadcast liv...
With in-person hearings limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, many courts pivoted to proceedings hel...
Over the past twenty years, most American courthouses have been wired with audio and video recording...
In several recent court cases, television viewers throughout the nation were able to see excerpts of...
The First Amendment is commonly interpreted to allow reporters a qualified privilege not to testify....
A peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and bro...
Obtaining protection for business secrets in an agency proceeding is at best an imperfect art. The l...
Parties litigant desire to obtain before trial all possible information relevant to the matter in is...
The scientific article presents the results of the study of the procedural features of the collectio...
This Note will argue that the attorney-client privilege is justified not only by the popular instrum...
The law of public interest immunity (PII), which permits the non-disclosure of material in evidence ...
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
The government may invoke the deliberative process privilege to protect the communications of govern...
The allowance of cameras in the courtroom and televised trials have seemed to cause a debate within ...