This handout from a Maryland Judicial Institute presentation covers the Maryland Rules concerning expert testimony and the ways they differ from the Federal Rules of Evidence
Abstract. While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert...
Fundamental to all evidence rules is the division of responsibility between the judge, who determine...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
This handout from a Maryland Judicial Institute presentation covers the Maryland Rules concerning ex...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
Handout from a day-long lecture on expert and scientific testimony at the Maryland Judicial Institut...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
This book offers a complete update of Monograph No. 6 focusing entirely on state and federal court e...
In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States stated that with the federal adoption of statutory r...
This volume provides in depth coverage of the topics that lawyers and judges must know when dealing ...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that expert testimony, in accordance with the Frye rule, must be...
Abstract. While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert...
Fundamental to all evidence rules is the division of responsibility between the judge, who determine...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
This handout from a Maryland Judicial Institute presentation covers the Maryland Rules concerning ex...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
Handout from a day-long lecture on expert and scientific testimony at the Maryland Judicial Institut...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
This book offers a complete update of Monograph No. 6 focusing entirely on state and federal court e...
In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States stated that with the federal adoption of statutory r...
This volume provides in depth coverage of the topics that lawyers and judges must know when dealing ...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that expert testimony, in accordance with the Frye rule, must be...
Abstract. While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert...
Fundamental to all evidence rules is the division of responsibility between the judge, who determine...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
DOI
Add to ORKG