The rule of Frye v. United States was seventy years old, and had long dominated American law on the question of how well established a scientific principle must be for it to provide the basis for expert testimony. Even after the passage of the Federal Rules of Evidence, several of the federal circuits, as well as various states, purported to adhere to Frye\u27s general acceptance standard. But now, unanimously, briefly, and with no apparent angst, the United States Supreme Court has held in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that the Frye rule is incompatible with the Federal Rules
When Justice Blackmun wrote Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the assignm...
Background paper prepared for the National Conference of lawyers and Scientists on Frye v. United St...
In Reese v. Stroh, the Washington Supreme Court upheld the use of the Frye test as a threshold inqui...
The rule of Frye v. United States was seventy years old, and had long dominated American law on the ...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
This Note examines the standard for the admission of novel scientific evidence at trial in Illinois....
In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States stated that with the federal adoption of statutory r...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
Nearly every treatment of scientific evidence begins with a faithful comparison between the Frye and...
This Article explores one aspect of this development-the evidentiary standards employed by courts to...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Feder...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
When Justice Blackmun wrote Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the assignm...
Background paper prepared for the National Conference of lawyers and Scientists on Frye v. United St...
In Reese v. Stroh, the Washington Supreme Court upheld the use of the Frye test as a threshold inqui...
The rule of Frye v. United States was seventy years old, and had long dominated American law on the ...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
This Note examines the standard for the admission of novel scientific evidence at trial in Illinois....
In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States stated that with the federal adoption of statutory r...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
Nearly every treatment of scientific evidence begins with a faithful comparison between the Frye and...
This Article explores one aspect of this development-the evidentiary standards employed by courts to...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Feder...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
When Justice Blackmun wrote Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the assignm...
Background paper prepared for the National Conference of lawyers and Scientists on Frye v. United St...
In Reese v. Stroh, the Washington Supreme Court upheld the use of the Frye test as a threshold inqui...