Add to ORKGIn Reese v. Stroh, the Washington Supreme Court upheld the use of the Frye test as a threshold inquiry in civil cases involving novel scientific evidence. By affirming the decision of the court of appeals, but not its reasoning, the Washington Supreme Court side-stepped the court of appeals\u27s argument for adoption of the Daubert standard in civil cases analyzing ER 702. This Note examines the decision in Reese v. Stroh and concludes that the Washington Supreme Court failed to determine clearly the proper analysis of ER 702 in cases involving novel scientific evidence. It further agrees with Justice Johnson\u27s concurring opinion that the Daubert test provides the appropriate analysis of ER 702 under such circumstances. It recommends tha...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Feder...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States stated that with the federal adoption of statutory r...
Nearly every treatment of scientific evidence begins with a faithful comparison between the Frye and...
Twenty-five years ago, the Supreme Court decided one of the most important cases concerning the use ...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
In the 1993 landmark case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court ar...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
The thesis of this article is that the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutic...
In Daubert, the Supreme Court interpreted Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to permit an arguably more-re...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Feder...
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court\u2...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States stated that with the federal adoption of statutory r...
Nearly every treatment of scientific evidence begins with a faithful comparison between the Frye and...
Twenty-five years ago, the Supreme Court decided one of the most important cases concerning the use ...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
In the 1993 landmark case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court ar...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
The thesis of this article is that the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutic...
In Daubert, the Supreme Court interpreted Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to permit an arguably more-re...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...