The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose under federal tax law. The primary justification for this rule is that tax benefits should be preserved for opposite-sex married couples. This article points out the absurdity of such a rule, given that tax law is not intended to privilege married couples, but instead is intended to measure their taxable income fairly on the basis of their status as related parties. The article then considers other justifications for applying DOMA to federal tax law and concludes that none of them meet minimal levels of rationality to support retaining the DOMA ban in the year 2009. Because the justifications fail, DOMA, as applied to federal tax law, is uncon...
At the present time, same-sex marriage is permitted in six states, while civil unions or domestic pa...
This Article argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is not unconstitutional - at least not y...
This essay takes a critical look at the tax fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
The Supreme Court’s two recent decisions ( Windsor and Hollingsworth ) holding that Section 3 of the...
Various states now recognize relationships between people of the same-sex, but due to the Defense of...
The Internal Revenue Code privileges married couples in several different ways. Not only do certain ...
Another federal judge has now ruled that the provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that pr...
En route to finding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Am...
According to the text of the Act, DOMA\u27s purposes are to define and protect the institution of m...
The tax world for same-sex couples changed dramatically on June 26, 2013, when the United States Sup...
Various states now recognize relationships between people of the same-sex, but due to the Defense of...
In this article, I take a novel approach to the question of what constitutes a tax. I argue that t...
This Comment examines the efforts of gays and lesbians to obtain marital rights and the resistance t...
The federal tax laws have never been friendly territory for LGBT families. Before the enactment of t...
At the present time, same-sex marriage is permitted in six states, while civil unions or domestic pa...
This Article argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is not unconstitutional - at least not y...
This essay takes a critical look at the tax fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
The Supreme Court’s two recent decisions ( Windsor and Hollingsworth ) holding that Section 3 of the...
Various states now recognize relationships between people of the same-sex, but due to the Defense of...
The Internal Revenue Code privileges married couples in several different ways. Not only do certain ...
Another federal judge has now ruled that the provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that pr...
En route to finding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Am...
According to the text of the Act, DOMA\u27s purposes are to define and protect the institution of m...
The tax world for same-sex couples changed dramatically on June 26, 2013, when the United States Sup...
Various states now recognize relationships between people of the same-sex, but due to the Defense of...
In this article, I take a novel approach to the question of what constitutes a tax. I argue that t...
This Comment examines the efforts of gays and lesbians to obtain marital rights and the resistance t...
The federal tax laws have never been friendly territory for LGBT families. Before the enactment of t...
At the present time, same-sex marriage is permitted in six states, while civil unions or domestic pa...
This Article argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is not unconstitutional - at least not y...
This essay takes a critical look at the tax fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United...