Another federal judge has now ruled that the provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that precludes recognition of same-sex marriage for any federal-law purpose is unconstitutional. This provision of DOMA has taken several bullets in the last year, but the ruling in Pedersen v. OPM is even more damaging, as it carefully refutes every conceivable argument made in defense of the law, and identifies multiple theories on which it could be invalidated
When eighty-four-year-old Edie Windsor challenged the Defense of Marriage Act\u27s constitutionality...
In US v. Windsor (2013) the Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of DOMA violates the Fifth Amendment ...
According to the text of the Act, DOMA\u27s purposes are to define and protect the institution of m...
During the brief window in 2008 when the state of California permitted same-sex couples to marry, Ka...
En route to finding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Am...
En route to finding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Am...
This Article argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is not unconstitutional - at least not y...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
This Comment examines the efforts of gays and lesbians to obtain marital rights and the resistance t...
In Commonwealth v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the F...
24 p. ; This student paper has been award the 2004-2005 Raymond W. Schowers Prize.Striving to preser...
On the tenth anniversary of its leading gay rights decision, Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme Court ru...
When eighty-four-year-old Edie Windsor challenged the Defense of Marriage Act\u27s constitutionality...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
The author seeks to explain why courts should not be permitted to interpret the Defense of Marriage ...
When eighty-four-year-old Edie Windsor challenged the Defense of Marriage Act\u27s constitutionality...
In US v. Windsor (2013) the Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of DOMA violates the Fifth Amendment ...
According to the text of the Act, DOMA\u27s purposes are to define and protect the institution of m...
During the brief window in 2008 when the state of California permitted same-sex couples to marry, Ka...
En route to finding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Am...
En route to finding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Am...
This Article argues that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is not unconstitutional - at least not y...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
This Comment examines the efforts of gays and lesbians to obtain marital rights and the resistance t...
In Commonwealth v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the F...
24 p. ; This student paper has been award the 2004-2005 Raymond W. Schowers Prize.Striving to preser...
On the tenth anniversary of its leading gay rights decision, Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme Court ru...
When eighty-four-year-old Edie Windsor challenged the Defense of Marriage Act\u27s constitutionality...
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages for any purpose u...
The author seeks to explain why courts should not be permitted to interpret the Defense of Marriage ...
When eighty-four-year-old Edie Windsor challenged the Defense of Marriage Act\u27s constitutionality...
In US v. Windsor (2013) the Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of DOMA violates the Fifth Amendment ...
According to the text of the Act, DOMA\u27s purposes are to define and protect the institution of m...