Add to ORKGThe trial court\u27s error in refusing to give instructions as to the defendant\u27s use of self-defense was prejudicial, resulted in a miscarriage of justice, and required a reversal of the judgment and the order denying defendant a new trial
The order of a new trial in the injured party\u27s action against the driver was improper because th...
Remarks of the prosecuting attorney were not prejudicial to defendants because of the overwhelming e...
A request for a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense is sufficient if there is any evidence...
The trial court\u27s error in refusing to give instructions as to the defendant\u27s use of self-def...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
In murder case, the court did not have the authority to reduce defendant\u27s death sentence to life...
The Supreme Court of Nevada, reviewing the case de novo, considered whether the errors committed by ...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...
Defendant was properly convicted of second degree murder as the jury was correctly instructed on the...
Defendant\u27s complaint that erroneous instructions were given did not authorize the recall of remi...
In November, a state appellate court threw out the first-degree murder conviction of Daniel Belknap,...
A verdict of first-degree murder was proper under the felony murder doctrine because the evidence sh...
Omit from present section word “criminal,” thereby providing that no judgment shall be set aside or ...
The Court determined although the district court has broad discretion to settle jury instructions, t...
Appellant who was convicted of committing a criminal abortion, moved for a new trial alleging as err...
The order of a new trial in the injured party\u27s action against the driver was improper because th...
Remarks of the prosecuting attorney were not prejudicial to defendants because of the overwhelming e...
A request for a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense is sufficient if there is any evidence...
The trial court\u27s error in refusing to give instructions as to the defendant\u27s use of self-def...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
In murder case, the court did not have the authority to reduce defendant\u27s death sentence to life...
The Supreme Court of Nevada, reviewing the case de novo, considered whether the errors committed by ...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...
Defendant was properly convicted of second degree murder as the jury was correctly instructed on the...
Defendant\u27s complaint that erroneous instructions were given did not authorize the recall of remi...
In November, a state appellate court threw out the first-degree murder conviction of Daniel Belknap,...
A verdict of first-degree murder was proper under the felony murder doctrine because the evidence sh...
Omit from present section word “criminal,” thereby providing that no judgment shall be set aside or ...
The Court determined although the district court has broad discretion to settle jury instructions, t...
Appellant who was convicted of committing a criminal abortion, moved for a new trial alleging as err...
The order of a new trial in the injured party\u27s action against the driver was improper because th...
Remarks of the prosecuting attorney were not prejudicial to defendants because of the overwhelming e...
A request for a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense is sufficient if there is any evidence...